TSTP Solution File: GEO037-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO037-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 6.91s 7.14s
% Output : Refutation 6.91s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GEO037-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 21:17:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Fri Jun 17 21:17:04 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23450.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 36 back subsumes 33.
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [copy,39,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.46 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.46 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.46 number of clauses in intial UL: 33
% 0.18/0.46 number of clauses initially in problem: 37
% 0.18/0.46 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 89
% 0.18/0.46 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.18/0.46 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.46 absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.18/0.46 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.18/0.46 distinct function count: 5
% 0.18/0.46 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 =========== start of search ===========
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 -------- PROOF --------
% 6.91/7.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.91/7.14 % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Model 3 [ 2 62 194296 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Model 5 [ 38 62 228156 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Model 6 [ 55 54 208841 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Model 7 [ 50 60 230111 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Model 8 [ 146 29 64588 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Model 9 [ 92 38 162820 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Model 10 [ 63 52 244063 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Model 11 [ 56 29 135693 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Model 12 [ 212 15 60689 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 6.77 sec ----> 381 [binary,380.1,173.1] {-} $F.
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Length of proof is 10. Level of proof is 7.
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 6.91/7.14 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.91/7.14 % SZS output start Refutation
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 1 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)| -equidistant(A,B,E,F)|equidistant(C,D,E,F).
% 6.91/7.14 2 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 6.91/7.14 9 [] {+} -between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2).
% 6.91/7.14 16 [] {-} v=extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2)| -equidistant(v,extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),x,extension(w,x,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2))| -between(u,v,extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2)).
% 6.91/7.14 17 [copy,16,flip.1] {+} extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2)=v| -equidistant(v,extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),x,extension(w,x,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2))| -between(u,v,extension(u,v,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2)).
% 6.91/7.14 18 [factor,1.1.2] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)|equidistant(C,D,C,D).
% 6.91/7.14 36 [] {+} equidistant(A,B,B,A).
% 6.91/7.14 37 [] {+} between(A,B,extension(A,B,C,D)).
% 6.91/7.14 38 [] {+} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 6.91/7.14 40 [hyper,36,18] {+} equidistant(A,B,A,B).
% 6.91/7.14 76 [hyper,38,2,flip.1] {+} extension(A,B,C,C)=B.
% 6.91/7.14 79 [hyper,38,1,40] {+} equidistant(A,B,C,extension(D,C,A,B)).
% 6.91/7.14 173 [para_from,76.1.1,37.1.3] {+} between(A,B,B).
% 6.91/7.14 340 [hyper,79,1,79] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),E,extension(F,E,C,D)).
% 6.91/7.14 353 [para_into,79.1.4,17.1.1,unit_del,340,37] {+} equidistant(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,v,v).
% 6.91/7.14 367,366 [hyper,353,2,flip.1] {-} lower_dimension_point_2=lower_dimension_point_1.
% 6.91/7.14 380 [back_demod,9,demod,367] {-} -between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_1).
% 6.91/7.14 381 [binary,380.1,173.1] {-} $F.
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 % SZS output end Refutation
% 6.91/7.14 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 ============ end of search ============
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 true clauses given 1 (7.7%)
% 6.91/7.14 false clauses given 12
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 FALSE TRUE
% 6.91/7.14 7 0 1
% 6.91/7.14 8 0 1
% 6.91/7.14 9 5 0
% 6.91/7.14 10 1 0
% 6.91/7.14 11 1 0
% 6.91/7.14 12 3 0
% 6.91/7.14 13 6 0
% 6.91/7.14 14 4 0
% 6.91/7.14 15 3 0
% 6.91/7.14 16 4 2
% 6.91/7.14 17 6 0
% 6.91/7.14 18 7 1
% 6.91/7.14 19 2 0
% 6.91/7.14 20 8 2
% 6.91/7.14 21 3 1
% 6.91/7.14 22 2 1
% 6.91/7.14 23 2 1
% 6.91/7.14 24 1 0
% 6.91/7.14 25 1 1
% 6.91/7.14 26 3 0
% 6.91/7.14 27 4 0
% 6.91/7.14 28 3 0
% 6.91/7.14 29 2 0
% 6.91/7.14 30 5 1
% 6.91/7.14 31 4 4
% 6.91/7.14 32 3 0
% 6.91/7.14 33 5 0
% 6.91/7.14 34 13 0
% 6.91/7.14 35 5 0
% 6.91/7.14 36 7 4
% 6.91/7.14 37 4 1
% 6.91/7.14 38 12 6
% 6.91/7.14 39 9 0
% 6.91/7.14 40 3 1
% 6.91/7.14 41 0 1
% 6.91/7.14 42 10 0
% 6.91/7.14 43 9 0
% 6.91/7.14 44 4 0
% 6.91/7.14 45 7 3
% 6.91/7.14 46 6 0
% 6.91/7.14 47 2 0
% 6.91/7.14 48 8 0
% 6.91/7.14 49 1 0
% 6.91/7.14 50 4 1
% 6.91/7.14 51 3 0
% 6.91/7.14 53 3 0
% 6.91/7.14 54 8 13
% 6.91/7.14 55 2 0
% 6.91/7.14 56 2 0
% 6.91/7.14 57 1 0
% 6.91/7.14 58 2 0
% 6.91/7.14 59 4 0
% 6.91/7.14 tot: 217 46 (17.5% true)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Model 12 [ 212 15 60689 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 6.91/7.14
% 6.91/7.14 Process 23450 finished Fri Jun 17 21:17:11 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------