TSTP Solution File: GEO036-2 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : GEO036-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:11:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 26 ( 11 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 43 ( 11 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 19 ~; 14 |; 0 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 5 usr; 4 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f57,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f32,f42,f45,f56]) ).
fof(f56,plain,
~ spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f55]) ).
fof(f55,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f54,f39]) ).
fof(f39,plain,
! [X3,X4] : between(X3,X4,X4),
inference(superposition,[],[f4,f37]) ).
fof(f37,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] : extension(X1,X0,X2,X2) = X0,
inference(resolution,[],[f5,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X2)
| X0 = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',identity_for_equidistance) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X1,X5] : equidistant(X1,extension(X0,X1,X5,X3),X5,X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',segment_construction2) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X1,X5] : between(X0,X1,extension(X0,X1,X5,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',segment_construction1) ).
fof(f54,plain,
( ~ between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_1)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f11,f23]) ).
fof(f23,plain,
( lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_3
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f21]) ).
fof(f21,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_3 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f11,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lower_dimension2) ).
fof(f45,plain,
~ spl0_3,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f44]) ).
fof(f44,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f43,f39]) ).
fof(f43,plain,
( ~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_1)
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f12,f31]) ).
fof(f31,plain,
( lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_2
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f29]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_2 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lower_dimension3) ).
fof(f42,plain,
~ spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f40]) ).
fof(f40,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f39,f34]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
( ~ between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_2)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f10,f27]) ).
fof(f27,plain,
( lower_dimension_point_2 = lower_dimension_point_3
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f25]) ).
fof(f25,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> lower_dimension_point_2 = lower_dimension_point_3 ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',lower_dimension1) ).
fof(f32,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_2
| spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f29,f25,f21]) ).
fof(f19,axiom,
( lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_2
| lower_dimension_point_2 = lower_dimension_point_3
| lower_dimension_point_1 = lower_dimension_point_3 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_axioms_points_are_distinct) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GEO036-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 21:04:25 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.50 % (5032)ott+10_1:28_bd=off:bs=on:tgt=ground:i=101:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/101Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)First to succeed.
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.50 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)Time elapsed: 0.102 s
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (5023)------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 % (5016)Success in time 0.15 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------