TSTP Solution File: GEO036-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO036-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.55s 4.72s
% Output : Refutation 4.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : GEO036-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 05:46:07 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.36 The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.36 Sat Jun 18 05:46:07 2022
% 0.14/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 29783.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.36 34 back subsumes 31.
% 0.14/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [copy,39,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.36
% 0.14/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.52 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.52 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.53 number of clauses in intial UL: 32
% 0.20/0.53 number of clauses initially in problem: 37
% 0.20/0.53 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 86
% 0.20/0.53 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.20/0.53 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.53 absolute distinct symbol count: 11
% 0.20/0.53 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.20/0.53 distinct function count: 5
% 0.20/0.53 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 =========== start of search ===========
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 -------- PROOF --------
% 4.55/4.72 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.55/4.72 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Model 3 [ 2 73 212271 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Model 4 [ 4 69 236332 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Model 5 [ 36 38 135383 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Model 6 [ 52 60 207803 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Model 7 [ 40 31 125807 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 4.33 sec ----> 621 [binary,620.1,384.1] {+} $F.
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Length of proof is 8. Level of proof is 6.
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 4.55/4.72 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.55/4.72 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 2 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 4.55/4.72 7 [] {+} -between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3).
% 4.55/4.72 8 [] {+} -between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1).
% 4.55/4.72 9 [] {+} -between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2).
% 4.55/4.72 35 [] {+} between(A,B,extension(A,B,C,D)).
% 4.55/4.72 36 [] {+} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 4.55/4.72 37 [] {-} lower_dimension_point_1=lower_dimension_point_2|lower_dimension_point_2=lower_dimension_point_3|lower_dimension_point_1=lower_dimension_point_3.
% 4.55/4.72 38 [copy,37,flip.1,flip.2,flip.3] {-} lower_dimension_point_2=lower_dimension_point_1|lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_2|lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_1.
% 4.55/4.72 75 [hyper,36,2,flip.1] {+} extension(A,B,C,C)=B.
% 4.55/4.72 161 [para_from,38.1.1,9.1.3] {-} -between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_1)|lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_2|lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_1.
% 4.55/4.72 384 [para_from,75.1.1,35.1.3] {+} between(A,B,B).
% 4.55/4.72 545 [hyper,384,161] {-} lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_2|lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_1.
% 4.55/4.72 616,615 [para_from,545.1.1,7.1.3,unit_del,384] {-} lower_dimension_point_3=lower_dimension_point_1.
% 4.55/4.72 619,618 [para_from,545.2.1,8.1.2,demod,616,unit_del,384,flip.1] {-} lower_dimension_point_2=lower_dimension_point_1.
% 4.55/4.72 620 [back_demod,9,demod,616,619] {-} -between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_1).
% 4.55/4.72 621 [binary,620.1,384.1] {+} $F.
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.55/4.72 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 ============ end of search ============
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 true clauses given 3 (21.4%)
% 4.55/4.72 false clauses given 11
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 FALSE TRUE
% 4.55/4.72 7 2 1
% 4.55/4.72 8 0 1
% 4.55/4.72 9 3 2
% 4.55/4.72 10 3 1
% 4.55/4.72 11 6 3
% 4.55/4.72 12 0 3
% 4.55/4.72 13 1 0
% 4.55/4.72 14 4 1
% 4.55/4.72 15 3 1
% 4.55/4.72 16 4 2
% 4.55/4.72 17 3 1
% 4.55/4.72 18 0 5
% 4.55/4.72 19 0 5
% 4.55/4.72 20 5 2
% 4.55/4.72 21 2 2
% 4.55/4.72 22 1 2
% 4.55/4.72 23 4 7
% 4.55/4.72 24 1 4
% 4.55/4.72 25 1 2
% 4.55/4.72 26 1 1
% 4.55/4.72 27 8 2
% 4.55/4.72 28 5 0
% 4.55/4.72 29 2 4
% 4.55/4.72 30 1 4
% 4.55/4.72 31 2 2
% 4.55/4.72 32 4 0
% 4.55/4.72 33 6 0
% 4.55/4.72 34 5 2
% 4.55/4.72 35 1 1
% 4.55/4.72 36 2 3
% 4.55/4.72 37 4 2
% 4.55/4.72 38 1 4
% 4.55/4.72 39 2 5
% 4.55/4.72 40 1 2
% 4.55/4.72 41 1 0
% 4.55/4.72 42 1 1
% 4.55/4.72 43 9 1
% 4.55/4.72 44 1 1
% 4.55/4.72 45 1 1
% 4.55/4.72 46 1 0
% 4.55/4.72 47 1 1
% 4.55/4.72 48 1 5
% 4.55/4.72 49 1 0
% 4.55/4.72 50 1 1
% 4.55/4.72 53 0 2
% 4.55/4.72 54 0 2
% 4.55/4.72 55 2 0
% 4.55/4.72 56 1 0
% 4.55/4.72 57 0 1
% 4.55/4.72 58 0 1
% 4.55/4.72 tot: 109 94 (46.3% true)
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Model 7 [ 40 31 125807 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 4.55/4.72
% 4.55/4.72 Process 29783 finished Sat Jun 18 05:46:12 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------