TSTP Solution File: GEO035-3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO035-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.37s 1.53s
% Output : Refutation 1.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GEO035-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 22:33:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35 Fri Jun 17 22:33:27 2022
% 0.19/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 7559.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.19/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.19/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.19/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35 42 back subsumes 39.
% 0.19/0.35 45 back subsumes 26.
% 0.19/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [copy,46,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.48/0.65 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.48/0.65 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.48/0.65 number of clauses in intial UL: 38
% 0.48/0.65 number of clauses initially in problem: 43
% 0.48/0.65 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 88
% 0.48/0.65 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.48/0.65 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.48/0.65 absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.48/0.65 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.48/0.65 distinct function count: 5
% 0.48/0.65 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.48/0.65
% 0.48/0.65 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.37/1.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.37/1.53 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.15 sec ----> 86 [binary,84.1,25.1] {+} $F.
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Length of proof is 2. Level of proof is 1.
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.37/1.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.37/1.53 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 2 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 1.37/1.53 24 [] {-} v!=extension(u,v,w,w).
% 1.37/1.53 25 [copy,24,flip.1] {+} extension(u,v,w,w)!=v.
% 1.37/1.53 44 [] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 1.37/1.53 84 [hyper,44,2,flip.1] {-} extension(A,B,C,C)=B.
% 1.37/1.53 86 [binary,84.1,25.1] {+} $F.
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.37/1.53 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 ============ end of search ============
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 1.37/1.53 false clauses given 3
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 FALSE TRUE
% 1.37/1.53 3 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 5 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 13 0 3
% 1.37/1.53 16 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 17 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 20 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 24 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 30 0 3
% 1.37/1.53 33 0 3
% 1.37/1.53 34 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 35 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 37 0 2
% 1.37/1.53 38 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 39 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 42 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 43 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 44 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 49 0 1
% 1.37/1.53 tot: 0 25 (100.0% true)
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.37/1.53
% 1.37/1.53 Process 7559 finished Fri Jun 17 22:33:28 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------