TSTP Solution File: GEO030-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO030-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 8.85s 9.04s
% Output   : Refutation 8.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.14  % Problem  : GEO030-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 16:00:56 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.39  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.39  The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.39  Fri Jun 17 16:00:56 2022
% 0.15/0.39  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 13164.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.39  set(auto).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.39  clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  list(usable).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.15/0.39  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.15/0.39  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.15/0.39  clauses in usable.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.39     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.39  38 back subsumes 35.
% 0.15/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 44 during input processing: 0 [copy,44,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.65/0.85  
% 0.65/0.85  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.65/0.85  
% 0.65/0.85  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.65/0.85  
% 0.65/0.85  
% 0.65/0.85  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.65/0.85  
% 0.65/0.85  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.65/0.85  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.65/0.85  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.65/0.85  number of clauses in intial UL: 34
% 0.65/0.85  number of clauses initially in problem: 41
% 0.65/0.85  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 82
% 0.65/0.85  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.65/0.85  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.65/0.85  absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.65/0.85     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.65/0.85     distinct function count: 5
% 0.65/0.85     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.65/0.85  
% 0.65/0.85  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.65/0.85  
% 0.65/0.85  
% 0.65/0.85  
% 0.65/0.85  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.65/0.85  
% 0.65/0.85  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.65/0.85  
% 0.65/0.85  =========== start of search ===========
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 8.85/9.04  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 8.85/9.04  % SZS output start Refutation
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 4 [ 1 48 178692 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 5 [ 4 46 172061 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 6 [ 6 47 177969 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 7 [ 1 52 188151 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 8 [ 53 10 38208 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 9 [ 76 15 58404 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 10 [ 38 45 168389 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 11 [ 110 3 9684 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 12 [ 93 2 4833 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 13 [ 108 8 17165 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 14 [ 124 19 78679 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 15 [ 109 4 11438 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 16 [ 103 1 4004 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 17 [ 63 51 215557 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 18 [ 67 48 206674 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 19 [ 62 23 111287 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   8.62 sec ----> 1659 [binary,1657.1,19.1] {-} $F.
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Length of proof is 8.  Level of proof is 5.
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 8.85/9.04  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 8.85/9.04  % SZS output start Refutation
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  1 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)| -equidistant(A,B,E,F)|equidistant(C,D,E,F).
% 8.85/9.04  2 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 8.85/9.04  3 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)| -equidistant(B,E,D,F)| -equidistant(A,G,C,H)| -equidistant(B,G,D,H)| -between(A,B,E)| -between(C,D,F)|A=B|equidistant(E,G,F,H).
% 8.85/9.04  16 [] {-} u!=v.
% 8.85/9.04  17 [copy,16,flip.1] {+} v!=u.
% 8.85/9.04  18 [] {-} w!=w1.
% 8.85/9.04  19 [copy,18,flip.1] {+} w1!=w.
% 8.85/9.04  20 [factor,1.1.2] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)|equidistant(C,D,C,D).
% 8.85/9.04  23 [factor,3.5.6] {+} -equidistant(A,B,A,B)| -equidistant(B,C,B,C)| -equidistant(A,D,A,E)| -equidistant(B,D,B,E)| -between(A,B,C)|A=B|equidistant(C,D,C,E).
% 8.85/9.04  38 [] {+} equidistant(A,B,B,A).
% 8.85/9.04  41 [] {+} between(u,v,w).
% 8.85/9.04  42 [] {+} equidistant(u,w,u,w1).
% 8.85/9.04  43 [] {+} equidistant(v,w,v,w1).
% 8.85/9.04  45 [hyper,38,20] {+} equidistant(A,B,A,B).
% 8.85/9.04  282 [hyper,45,23,45,42,43,41,unit_del,17] {+} equidistant(w,w,w,w1).
% 8.85/9.04  710 [hyper,282,1,45] {-} equidistant(w,w1,w,w).
% 8.85/9.04  1657 [hyper,710,2,flip.1] {-} w1=w.
% 8.85/9.04  1659 [binary,1657.1,19.1] {-} $F.
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  % SZS output end Refutation
% 8.85/9.04  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  ============ end of search ============
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  true clauses given           5      (20.0%)
% 8.85/9.04  false clauses given         20
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04        FALSE     TRUE
% 8.85/9.04     5  2         2
% 8.85/9.04     7  1         0
% 8.85/9.04     8  0         9
% 8.85/9.04     9  34        47
% 8.85/9.04    10  30        28
% 8.85/9.04    11  3         4
% 8.85/9.04    12  0         7
% 8.85/9.04    13  6         22
% 8.85/9.04    14  3         62
% 8.85/9.04    15  2         0
% 8.85/9.04    16  11        2
% 8.85/9.04    17  9         28
% 8.85/9.04    18  29        97
% 8.85/9.04    19  2         24
% 8.85/9.04    20  18        12
% 8.85/9.04    21  1         25
% 8.85/9.04    22  63        79
% 8.85/9.04    23  7         81
% 8.85/9.04    24  22        33
% 8.85/9.04    25  1         0
% 8.85/9.04    26  1         38
% 8.85/9.04    27  28        109
% 8.85/9.04    28  0         22
% 8.85/9.04    29  4         1
% 8.85/9.04    30  0         3
% 8.85/9.04    31  2         49
% 8.85/9.04    32  22        71
% 8.85/9.04    33  52        110
% 8.85/9.04    34  3         1
% 8.85/9.04    35  1         1
% 8.85/9.04    36  1         34
% 8.85/9.04    37  1         29
% 8.85/9.04    38  29        26
% 8.85/9.04    39  3         0
% 8.85/9.04    40  3         0
% 8.85/9.04    41  1         18
% 8.85/9.04    42  1         36
% 8.85/9.04    43  2         2
% 8.85/9.04    44  2         0
% 8.85/9.04    45  1         1
% 8.85/9.04    46  0         3
% 8.85/9.04    47  0         22
% 8.85/9.04    49  2         0
% 8.85/9.04    50  1         0
% 8.85/9.04    51  0         2
% 8.85/9.04    52  0         13
% 8.85/9.04    55  1         0
% 8.85/9.04    57  0         5
% 8.85/9.04  tot:  405       1158      (74.1% true)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Model 19 [ 62 -38 111287 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 8.85/9.04  
% 8.85/9.04  Process 13164 finished Fri Jun 17 16:01:05 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------