TSTP Solution File: GEO029-3 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : GEO029-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:33:28 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   24 (  11 unt;   6 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   51 (  16 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   86 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(d4_4,axiom,
    ( equidistant(X4,X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b62hY1mj07/E---3.1_13736.p',d4_4) ).

cnf(segment_construction2,axiom,
    equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b62hY1mj07/E---3.1_13736.p',segment_construction2) ).

cnf(transitivity_for_equidistance,axiom,
    ( equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b62hY1mj07/E---3.1_13736.p',transitivity_for_equidistance) ).

cnf(d9,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 = X4
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X2,X3,X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b62hY1mj07/E---3.1_13736.p',d9) ).

cnf(segment_construction1,axiom,
    between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b62hY1mj07/E---3.1_13736.p',segment_construction1) ).

cnf(d2,axiom,
    ( equidistant(X3,X4,X1,X2)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b62hY1mj07/E---3.1_13736.p',d2) ).

cnf(prove_equal_extensions,negated_conjecture,
    extension(u,v,u,v) != extension(u,v,v,u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b62hY1mj07/E---3.1_13736.p',prove_equal_extensions) ).

cnf(u_not_v,hypothesis,
    u != v,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b62hY1mj07/E---3.1_13736.p',u_not_v) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( equidistant(X4,X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    d4_4 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4),
    segment_construction2 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X5,X6) ),
    transitivity_for_equidistance ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    equidistant(X1,X2,X3,extension(X4,X3,X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X3 = X4
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ between(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ equidistant(X2,X3,X2,X4) ),
    d9 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( equidistant(X1,X2,X3,extension(X4,X3,X5,X6))
    | ~ equidistant(X6,X5,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( X1 = extension(X2,X3,X4,X5)
    | X6 = X3
    | ~ between(X6,X3,extension(X2,X3,X4,X5))
    | ~ between(X6,X3,X1)
    | ~ equidistant(X5,X4,X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)),
    segment_construction1 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    ( equidistant(X3,X4,X1,X2)
    | ~ equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
    d2 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( X1 = extension(X2,X3,X4,X5)
    | X2 = X3
    | ~ between(X2,X3,X1)
    | ~ equidistant(X5,X4,X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    equidistant(X1,X2,X3,extension(X4,X3,X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( extension(X1,X2,X3,X4) = extension(X5,X2,X4,X3)
    | X5 = X2
    | ~ between(X5,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    extension(u,v,u,v) != extension(u,v,v,u),
    prove_equal_extensions ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( extension(X1,X2,X3,X4) = extension(X1,X2,X4,X3)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    u != v,
    u_not_v ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : GEO029-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Oct  3 06:17:56 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.46  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.b62hY1mj07/E---3.1_13736.p
% 0.20/0.51  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 13840 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with pid 13851 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51  # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.51  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 40
% 0.20/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 40
% 0.20/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 39
% 0.20/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 297
% 0.20/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 30
% 0.20/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 93
% 0.20/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 174
% 0.20/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 9
% 0.20/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 1734
% 0.20/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1245
% 0.20/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 1714
% 0.20/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 20
% 0.20/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 563
% 0.20/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 172
% 0.20/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 30
% 0.20/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 11
% 0.20/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 131
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 985
% 0.20/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 3856
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.20/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7231
% 0.20/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3611
% 0.20/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 88
% 0.20/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 514
% 0.20/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 888
% 0.20/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 17412
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  # User time                : 0.035 s
% 0.20/0.51  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Total time               : 0.041 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  # User time                : 0.177 s
% 0.20/0.51  # System time              : 0.025 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Total time               : 0.202 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1704 pages
% 0.20/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------