TSTP Solution File: GEO024-3 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : GEO024-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:07:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 5 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 1 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f50,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f49,f36]) ).
fof(f36,axiom,
~ equidistant(u,u,v,v),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_congruence) ).
fof(f49,plain,
! [X2,X1] : equidistant(X1,X1,X2,X2),
inference(superposition,[],[f5,f29]) ).
fof(f29,axiom,
! [X3,X10,X5] : extension(X10,X3,X5,X5) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',e1) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X1,X5] : equidistant(X1,extension(X0,X1,X5,X3),X5,X3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',segment_construction2) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : GEO024-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 21:17:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 % (1996)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.19/0.47 % (1996)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.48 % (2001)lrs+1004_1:734_av=off:awrs=converge:awrsf=70:br=off:ep=RSTC:erd=off:gs=on:nwc=3.0:s2a=on:s2agt=16:sp=occurrence:updr=off:urr=on:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (1992)lrs+10_1:16_awrs=converge:awrsf=40:br=off:ep=RSTC:flr=on:gsp=on:nwc=3.0:sos=on:urr=on:i=4:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (1995)dis+1011_1:16_fsr=off:nwc=2.0:i=25:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/25Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (1995)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.49 % (2019)lrs+10_1:1_av=off:sd=2:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:ss=axioms:to=lpo:i=73:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/73Mi)
% 0.19/0.49 % (1996)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 % (1996)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (1996)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49 % (1996)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49 % (1996)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 % (1996)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.19/0.49 % (1996)Time elapsed: 0.096 s
% 0.19/0.49 % (1996)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.19/0.49 % (1996)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (1996)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 % (1986)Success in time 0.151 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------