TSTP Solution File: GEO024-2 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO024-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.39s 2.59s
% Output : Refutation 2.39s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : GEO024-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 17:22:57 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Fri Jun 17 17:22:57 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 14409.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 35 back subsumes 32.
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [copy,38,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.47 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.47 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.47 number of clauses in intial UL: 33
% 0.18/0.47 number of clauses initially in problem: 37
% 0.18/0.47 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 89
% 0.18/0.47 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 92
% 0.18/0.47 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.47 absolute distinct symbol count: 13
% 0.18/0.47 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.18/0.47 distinct function count: 5
% 0.18/0.47 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.47
% 0.18/0.47 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.39/2.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.39/2.59 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 Model 3 [ 2 66 220467 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 Model 5 [ 50 62 234866 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 2.22 sec ----> 169 [binary,168.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 Length of proof is 2. Level of proof is 2.
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.39/2.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.39/2.59 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 2 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|A=B.
% 2.39/2.59 16 [] {+} -equidistant(u,u,v,v).
% 2.39/2.59 37 [] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 2.39/2.59 74 [hyper,37,2,flip.1] {+} extension(A,B,C,C)=B.
% 2.39/2.59 168 [para_from,74.1.1,37.1.2] {-} equidistant(A,A,B,B).
% 2.39/2.59 169 [binary,168.1,16.1] {-} $F.
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.39/2.59 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 ============ end of search ============
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 true clauses given 2 (28.6%)
% 2.39/2.59 false clauses given 5
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 FALSE TRUE
% 2.39/2.59 4 0 1
% 2.39/2.59 9 3 0
% 2.39/2.59 12 0 1
% 2.39/2.59 13 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 14 2 0
% 2.39/2.59 15 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 16 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 17 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 18 2 0
% 2.39/2.59 19 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 20 2 0
% 2.39/2.59 21 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 22 1 1
% 2.39/2.59 23 0 1
% 2.39/2.59 24 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 26 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 28 0 1
% 2.39/2.59 30 1 4
% 2.39/2.59 31 0 1
% 2.39/2.59 33 3 0
% 2.39/2.59 34 5 1
% 2.39/2.59 35 2 1
% 2.39/2.59 36 3 1
% 2.39/2.59 37 1 1
% 2.39/2.59 38 4 1
% 2.39/2.59 39 3 1
% 2.39/2.59 40 1 3
% 2.39/2.59 41 0 1
% 2.39/2.59 42 1 1
% 2.39/2.59 43 7 0
% 2.39/2.59 44 3 1
% 2.39/2.59 45 1 2
% 2.39/2.59 47 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 48 3 0
% 2.39/2.59 49 2 0
% 2.39/2.59 50 2 1
% 2.39/2.59 53 2 0
% 2.39/2.59 54 2 0
% 2.39/2.59 55 2 1
% 2.39/2.59 56 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 57 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 58 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 59 1 0
% 2.39/2.59 tot: 71 26 (26.8% true)
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 Model 5 [ 50 62 234866 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.39/2.59
% 2.39/2.59 Process 14409 finished Fri Jun 17 17:22:59 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------