TSTP Solution File: GEO022-3 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GEO022-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.j60NqkYfUD true

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:56:00 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.32s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 1.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GEO022-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.j60NqkYfUD true
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 22:28:57 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.36  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 1.11/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.11/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.11/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.11/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.11/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.11/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.11/0.78  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.32/0.80  % Solved by fo/fo7.sh.
% 1.32/0.80  % done 77 iterations in 0.027s
% 1.32/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.32/0.80  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.32/0.80  thf(u_type, type, u: $i).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(w_type, type, w: $i).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(z_type, type, z: $i).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(equidistant_type, type, equidistant: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(y_type, type, y: $i).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(v_type, type, v: $i).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(u_to_v_equals_w_to_x, axiom, (equidistant @ u @ v @ w @ x)).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl26, plain, ( (equidistant @ u @ v @ w @ x)),
% 1.32/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [u_to_v_equals_w_to_x])).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(d2, axiom,
% 1.32/0.80    (( ~( equidistant @ U @ V @ W @ X ) ) | ( equidistant @ W @ X @ U @ V ))).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain,
% 1.32/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.32/0.80         (~ (equidistant @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)
% 1.32/0.80          |  (equidistant @ X2 @ X3 @ X0 @ X1))),
% 1.32/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [d2])).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl52, plain, ( (equidistant @ w @ x @ u @ v)),
% 1.32/0.80      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl26, zip_derived_cl19])).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(transitivity_for_equidistance, axiom,
% 1.32/0.80    (( ~( equidistant @ X @ Y @ Z @ V ) ) | 
% 1.32/0.80     ( ~( equidistant @ X @ Y @ V2 @ W ) ) | ( equidistant @ Z @ V @ V2 @ W ))).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.32/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i, X5 : $i]:
% 1.32/0.80         (~ (equidistant @ X0 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)
% 1.32/0.80          | ~ (equidistant @ X0 @ X1 @ X4 @ X5)
% 1.32/0.80          |  (equidistant @ X2 @ X3 @ X4 @ X5))),
% 1.32/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity_for_equidistance])).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl121, plain,
% 1.32/0.80      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.32/0.80         ( (equidistant @ u @ v @ X1 @ X0) | ~ (equidistant @ w @ x @ X1 @ X0))),
% 1.32/0.80      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl52, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(prove_transitivity, conjecture, (equidistant @ u @ v @ y @ z)).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( equidistant @ u @ v @ y @ z )),
% 1.32/0.80    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_transitivity])).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain, (~ (equidistant @ u @ v @ y @ z)),
% 1.32/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl228, plain, (~ (equidistant @ w @ x @ y @ z)),
% 1.32/0.80      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl121, zip_derived_cl28])).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(w_to_x_equals_y_to_z, axiom, (equidistant @ w @ x @ y @ z)).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (equidistant @ w @ x @ y @ z)),
% 1.32/0.80      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [w_to_x_equals_y_to_z])).
% 1.32/0.80  thf(zip_derived_cl229, plain, ($false),
% 1.32/0.80      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl228, zip_derived_cl27])).
% 1.32/0.80  
% 1.32/0.80  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.32/0.80  
% 1.32/0.80  
% 1.32/0.80  % Terminating...
% 1.32/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 1.32/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------