TSTP Solution File: GEO022-3 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : GEO022-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:21:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.40s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 0 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 12 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(7,axiom,
( ~ equidistant(u,v,w,x)
| equidistant(x,w,u,v) ),
file('GEO022-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
( ~ equidistant(u,v,w,x)
| equidistant(x,w,v,u) ),
file('GEO022-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(9,axiom,
equidistant(u__dfg,v__dfg,w__dfg,x__dfg),
file('GEO022-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(10,axiom,
equidistant(w__dfg,x__dfg,y__dfg,z__dfg),
file('GEO022-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(11,axiom,
~ equidistant(u__dfg,v__dfg,y__dfg,z__dfg),
file('GEO022-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(13,axiom,
( ~ equidistant(u,v,w,x)
| ~ equidistant(u,v,y,z)
| equidistant(y,z,w,x) ),
file('GEO022-3.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(35,plain,
( ~ equidistant(u,v,y__dfg,z__dfg)
| ~ equidistant(u,v,u__dfg,v__dfg) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,11]),
[iquote('0:Res:13.2,11.0')] ).
cnf(43,plain,
equidistant(x__dfg,w__dfg,v__dfg,u__dfg),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9,8]),
[iquote('0:Res:9.0,8.0')] ).
cnf(58,plain,
equidistant(u__dfg,v__dfg,x__dfg,w__dfg),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[43,7]),
[iquote('0:Res:43.0,7.0')] ).
cnf(64,plain,
equidistant(w__dfg,x__dfg,u__dfg,v__dfg),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[58,7]),
[iquote('0:Res:58.0,7.0')] ).
cnf(246,plain,
~ equidistant(w__dfg,x__dfg,u__dfg,v__dfg),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,35]),
[iquote('0:Res:10.0,35.0')] ).
cnf(254,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[246,64]),
[iquote('0:MRR:246.0,64.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : GEO022-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 10:00:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.20/0.40 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.40 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.40 SPASS derived 224 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 68 clauses.
% 0.20/0.40 SPASS allocated 63223 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.40 SPASS spent 0:00:00.05 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.40 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.40 0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.40 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.40 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.40 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40
% 0.20/0.40 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 12 :
% 0.20/0.40 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.40 Formulae used in the proof : d4_4 d4_5 u_to_v_equals_w_to_x w_to_x_equals_y_to_z prove_transitivity transitivity_for_equidistance
% 0.20/0.40
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------