TSTP Solution File: GEO022-3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO022-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.88s 3.10s
% Output : Refutation 2.88s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO022-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 09:56:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.35 Sat Jun 18 09:56:08 2022
% 0.18/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 14577.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.35 40 back subsumes 37.
% 0.18/0.35 43 back subsumes 24.
% 0.18/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [copy,46,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.35
% 0.18/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.35/1.58
% 1.35/1.58 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.58
% 1.35/1.58 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.35/1.58
% 1.35/1.58
% 1.35/1.58 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.35/1.58
% 1.35/1.58 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.35/1.58 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.35/1.58 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.35/1.58 number of clauses in intial UL: 37
% 1.35/1.58 number of clauses initially in problem: 44
% 1.35/1.58 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 1.35/1.58 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 1.35/1.58 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.35/1.58 absolute distinct symbol count: 17
% 1.35/1.58 distinct predicate count: 3
% 1.35/1.58 distinct function count: 5
% 1.35/1.58 distinct constant count: 9
% 1.35/1.58
% 1.35/1.58 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.35/1.58
% 1.35/1.58
% 1.35/1.58
% 1.35/1.58 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.35/1.58
% 1.35/1.58 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.35/1.58
% 1.35/1.58 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.88/3.10 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.88/3.10 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 Model 4 [ 36 48 168479 ] (0.00 seconds, 189775 Inserts)
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 2.72 sec ----> 724 [binary,723.1,23.1] {+} $F.
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 2.
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.88/3.10 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.88/3.10 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 1 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)| -equidistant(A,B,E,F)|equidistant(C,D,E,F).
% 2.88/3.10 17 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)|equidistant(B,A,C,D).
% 2.88/3.10 21 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)|equidistant(D,C,A,B).
% 2.88/3.10 23 [] {+} -equidistant(u,v,y,z).
% 2.88/3.10 44 [] {-} equidistant(u,v,w,x).
% 2.88/3.10 45 [] {-} equidistant(w,x,y,z).
% 2.88/3.10 52 [hyper,45,17] {-} equidistant(x,w,y,z).
% 2.88/3.10 261 [hyper,44,21] {-} equidistant(x,w,u,v).
% 2.88/3.10 723 [hyper,52,1,261] {-} equidistant(u,v,y,z).
% 2.88/3.10 724 [binary,723.1,23.1] {+} $F.
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.88/3.10 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 ============ end of search ============
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 true clauses given 1 (6.7%)
% 2.88/3.10 false clauses given 14
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 FALSE TRUE
% 2.88/3.10 5 7 5
% 2.88/3.10 7 0 1
% 2.88/3.10 9 24 23
% 2.88/3.10 10 24 16
% 2.88/3.10 11 0 1
% 2.88/3.10 13 2 1
% 2.88/3.10 14 0 42
% 2.88/3.10 15 0 1
% 2.88/3.10 16 1 0
% 2.88/3.10 17 0 2
% 2.88/3.10 18 24 57
% 2.88/3.10 20 1 0
% 2.88/3.10 22 48 32
% 2.88/3.10 23 24 17
% 2.88/3.10 24 25 16
% 2.88/3.10 27 24 56
% 2.88/3.10 28 0 1
% 2.88/3.10 30 0 3
% 2.88/3.10 31 0 1
% 2.88/3.10 32 24 16
% 2.88/3.10 33 6 77
% 2.88/3.10 34 0 4
% 2.88/3.10 35 1 1
% 2.88/3.10 36 0 1
% 2.88/3.10 37 1 1
% 2.88/3.10 38 25 17
% 2.88/3.10 39 1 1
% 2.88/3.10 42 1 0
% 2.88/3.10 43 1 1
% 2.88/3.10 44 0 2
% 2.88/3.10 45 0 2
% 2.88/3.10 49 1 0
% 2.88/3.10 50 0 1
% 2.88/3.10 tot: 265 399 (60.1% true)
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 Model 4 [ 36 48 168479 ] (0.00 seconds, 189775 Inserts)
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.88/3.10
% 2.88/3.10 Process 14577 finished Sat Jun 18 09:56:11 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------