TSTP Solution File: GEO020-3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO020-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:28 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.75s
% Output : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.11 % Problem : GEO020-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.02/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 14:56:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Sat Jun 18 14:56:23 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 9938.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 37 back subsumes 34.
% 0.12/0.35 40 back subsumes 33.
% 0.12/0.35 40 back subsumes 19.
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 42 during input processing: 0 [copy,42,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.49/0.70
% 0.49/0.70 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.70
% 0.49/0.70 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.49/0.70
% 0.49/0.70
% 0.49/0.70 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.49/0.70
% 0.49/0.70 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.49/0.70 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.49/0.70 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.49/0.70 number of clauses in intial UL: 33
% 0.49/0.70 number of clauses initially in problem: 39
% 0.49/0.70 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 84
% 0.49/0.70 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.49/0.70 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.49/0.70 absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.49/0.70 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.49/0.70 distinct function count: 5
% 0.49/0.70 distinct constant count: 7
% 0.49/0.70
% 0.49/0.70 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.49/0.70
% 0.49/0.70
% 0.49/0.70
% 0.49/0.70 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.49/0.70
% 0.49/0.70 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.49/0.70
% 0.49/0.70 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.56/0.75 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.56/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 0.38 sec ----> 182 [binary,181.1,18.1] {-} $F.
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 Length of proof is 2. Level of proof is 2.
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.56/0.75 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.56/0.75 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 16 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)|equidistant(C,D,A,B).
% 0.56/0.75 17 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,D)|equidistant(B,A,C,D).
% 0.56/0.75 18 [] {+} -equidistant(x,w,u,v).
% 0.56/0.75 41 [] {-} equidistant(u,v,w,x).
% 0.56/0.75 44 [hyper,41,16] {-} equidistant(w,x,u,v).
% 0.56/0.75 181 [hyper,44,17] {-} equidistant(x,w,u,v).
% 0.56/0.75 182 [binary,181.1,18.1] {-} $F.
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.75 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 ============ end of search ============
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 true clauses given 0 (0.0%)
% 0.56/0.75 false clauses given 4
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 FALSE TRUE
% 0.56/0.75 3 0 1
% 0.56/0.75 5 1 1
% 0.56/0.75 8 1 0
% 0.56/0.75 9 9 0
% 0.56/0.75 10 8 0
% 0.56/0.75 14 0 8
% 0.56/0.75 18 14 2
% 0.56/0.75 22 14 2
% 0.56/0.75 23 8 2
% 0.56/0.75 24 0 8
% 0.56/0.75 27 16 0
% 0.56/0.75 28 0 4
% 0.56/0.75 32 8 0
% 0.56/0.75 33 0 24
% 0.56/0.75 38 0 8
% 0.56/0.75 tot: 79 60 (43.2% true)
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.56/0.75
% 0.56/0.75 Process 9938 finished Sat Jun 18 14:56:23 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------