TSTP Solution File: GEO018-2 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : GEO018-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:07:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.54s
% Output : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 7 ~; 6 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f35,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f34,f20]) ).
fof(f20,axiom,
~ equidistant(v,u,x,w),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_symmetry) ).
fof(f34,plain,
equidistant(v,u,x,w),
inference(resolution,[],[f32,f1]) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : equidistant(X0,X1,X1,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',reflexivity_for_equidistance) ).
fof(f32,plain,
! [X4,X5] :
( ~ equidistant(u,v,X4,X5)
| equidistant(X4,X5,x,w) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f30,f1]) ).
fof(f30,plain,
! [X2,X3,X1,X4] :
( ~ equidistant(w,x,X3,X4)
| equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)
| ~ equidistant(u,v,X1,X2) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f26,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X2,X3)
| ~ equidistant(X0,X1,X4,X5)
| equidistant(X2,X3,X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_for_equidistance) ).
fof(f26,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( equidistant(w,x,X0,X1)
| ~ equidistant(u,v,X0,X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f2,f19]) ).
fof(f19,axiom,
equidistant(u,v,w,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_to_v_equals_w_to_x) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO018-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 21:01:35 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.52 % (13315)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=49:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/49Mi)
% 0.19/0.52 % (13316)lrs+1010_1:4_amm=off:bce=on:sd=1:sos=on:ss=included:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.52 % (13332)lrs+1011_1:1_aac=none:bsr=unit_only:ep=R:sac=on:sos=all:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.19/0.52 % (13331)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=97:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/97Mi)
% 0.19/0.53 % (13324)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.19/0.53 % (13323)dis+1011_3:29_av=off:awrs=decay:awrsf=32:bce=on:drc=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:nwc=2.0:spb=goal_then_units:updr=off:urr=ec_only:i=29:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/29Mi)
% 0.19/0.53 % (13316)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (13316)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53 % (13316)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.53 % (13316)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.53 % (13316)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.19/0.53
% 0.19/0.53 % (13316)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.19/0.53 % (13316)Time elapsed: 0.113 s
% 0.19/0.53 % (13316)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.53 % (13316)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53 % (13316)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.53 % (13315)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.53 % (13336)lrs+10_1:1_av=off:sd=2:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:ss=axioms:to=lpo:i=73:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/73Mi)
% 0.19/0.53 TRYING [1]
% 0.19/0.54 TRYING [2]
% 0.19/0.54 % (13318)lrs+1010_1:1_bd=off:fd=off:fde=none:ins=3:sac=on:sos=on:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.54 % (13309)lrs+10_1:1_kws=precedence:lwlo=on:tgt=ground:i=99966:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99966Mi)
% 0.19/0.54 % (13334)lrs+1010_1:16_acc=on:anc=all:avsq=on:awrs=converge:s2a=on:sac=on:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=81:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/81Mi)
% 0.19/0.54 % (13334)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (13334)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.54 % (13334)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.54 % (13315)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.54 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.54 % (13315)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.54 % (13315)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.54 % (13315)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.54 % (13315)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.54
% 0.19/0.54 % (13315)Memory used [KB]: 1407
% 0.19/0.54 % (13315)Time elapsed: 0.115 s
% 0.19/0.54 % (13315)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.54 % (13315)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.54 % (13315)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.54 % (13308)Success in time 0.188 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------