TSTP Solution File: GEO016-3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO016-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:54 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.18s 1.83s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   19
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   9 unt;  14 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   9   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   32 (   7   >;  25   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   7 con; 0-6 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (;  28   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ equidistant > between > continuous > inner_pasch > euclid2 > euclid1 > extension > #nlpp > x > w > v > u > lower_dimension_point_3 > lower_dimension_point_2 > lower_dimension_point_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(lower_dimension_point_1,type,
    lower_dimension_point_1: $i ).

tff(euclid2,type,
    euclid2: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(x,type,
    x: $i ).

tff(lower_dimension_point_2,type,
    lower_dimension_point_2: $i ).

tff(w,type,
    w: $i ).

tff(equidistant,type,
    equidistant: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(u,type,
    u: $i ).

tff(lower_dimension_point_3,type,
    lower_dimension_point_3: $i ).

tff(v,type,
    v: $i ).

tff(extension,type,
    extension: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(euclid1,type,
    euclid1: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(between,type,
    between: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(inner_pasch,type,
    inner_pasch: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(continuous,type,
    continuous: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_233,axiom,
    ~ equidistant(v,u,w,x),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_231,axiom,
    equidistant(u,v,w,x),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_58,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : equidistant(X,Y,Y,X),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_67,axiom,
    ! [W,Z,X,Y,V,V2] :
      ( ~ equidistant(X,Y,Z,V)
      | ~ equidistant(X,Y,V2,W)
      | equidistant(Z,V,V2,W) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_230,axiom,
    ! [U,V,W,X] :
      ( ~ equidistant(U,V,W,X)
      | equidistant(W,X,U,V) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_44,plain,
    ~ equidistant(v,u,w,x),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_233]) ).

tff(c_42,plain,
    equidistant(u,v,w,x),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_231]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [X_1,Y_2] : equidistant(X_1,Y_2,Y_2,X_1),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_58]) ).

tff(c_115,plain,
    ! [X_111,Y_109,W_110,Z_108,V_106,V2_107] :
      ( equidistant(Z_108,V_106,V2_107,W_110)
      | ~ equidistant(X_111,Y_109,V2_107,W_110)
      | ~ equidistant(X_111,Y_109,Z_108,V_106) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_67]) ).

tff(c_150,plain,
    ! [Z_116,V_117,Y_118,X_119] :
      ( equidistant(Z_116,V_117,Y_118,X_119)
      | ~ equidistant(X_119,Y_118,Z_116,V_117) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_115]) ).

tff(c_172,plain,
    equidistant(w,x,v,u),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_150]) ).

tff(c_40,plain,
    ! [W_76,X_77,U_74,V_75] :
      ( equidistant(W_76,X_77,U_74,V_75)
      | ~ equidistant(U_74,V_75,W_76,X_77) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_230]) ).

tff(c_195,plain,
    equidistant(v,u,w,x),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_172,c_40]) ).

tff(c_201,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_195]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GEO016-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:57:17 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.18/1.83  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.18/1.84  
% 3.18/1.84  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.45/1.87  
% 3.45/1.87  Inference rules
% 3.45/1.87  ----------------------
% 3.45/1.87  #Ref     : 0
% 3.45/1.87  #Sup     : 38
% 3.45/1.87  #Fact    : 0
% 3.45/1.87  #Define  : 0
% 3.45/1.87  #Split   : 0
% 3.45/1.87  #Chain   : 0
% 3.45/1.87  #Close   : 0
% 3.45/1.87  
% 3.45/1.87  Ordering : KBO
% 3.45/1.87  
% 3.45/1.87  Simplification rules
% 3.45/1.87  ----------------------
% 3.45/1.87  #Subsume      : 1
% 3.45/1.87  #Demod        : 9
% 3.45/1.87  #Tautology    : 15
% 3.45/1.87  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.45/1.87  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.45/1.87  
% 3.45/1.87  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.45/1.87  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.45/1.87  
% 3.45/1.87  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.45/1.87  ----------------------
% 3.45/1.88  Preprocessing        : 0.51
% 3.45/1.88  Parsing              : 0.29
% 3.45/1.88  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.45/1.88  Main loop            : 0.29
% 3.45/1.88  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 3.45/1.88  Reduction            : 0.09
% 3.45/1.88  Demodulation         : 0.06
% 3.45/1.88  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.45/1.88  Subsumption          : 0.07
% 3.45/1.88  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.45/1.88  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.45/1.88  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.45/1.88  Total                : 0.86
% 3.45/1.88  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.45/1.88  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.45/1.88  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.45/1.88  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------