TSTP Solution File: GEO015-3 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : GEO015-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 23:26:50 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.42s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : GEO015-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 21:19:41 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.42  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.42  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.20/0.42    fof(d1, axiom, ![V, U]: equidistant(U, V, U, V)).
% 0.20/0.42    fof(prove_symmetry, negated_conjecture, ~equidistant(w, x, u, v)).
% 0.20/0.42    fof(transitivity_for_equidistance, axiom, ![X, Y, Z, V2, W, V3]: (~equidistant(X, Y, Z, V3) | (~equidistant(X, Y, V2, W) | equidistant(Z, V3, V2, W)))).
% 0.20/0.42    fof(u_to_v_equals_w_to_x, hypothesis, equidistant(u, v, w, x)).
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.20/0.42  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.20/0.42  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.20/0.42    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.20/0.42    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.20/0.42  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.20/0.42  variables of u and v.
% 0.20/0.42  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.20/0.42  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Axiom 1 (d1): equidistant(X, Y, X, Y) = true.
% 0.20/0.42  Axiom 2 (u_to_v_equals_w_to_x): equidistant(u, v, w, x) = true.
% 0.20/0.42  Axiom 3 (transitivity_for_equidistance): fresh3(X, X, Y, Z, W, V) = true.
% 0.20/0.42  Axiom 4 (transitivity_for_equidistance): fresh4(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U, T) = equidistant(W, V, U, T).
% 0.20/0.42  Axiom 5 (transitivity_for_equidistance): fresh4(equidistant(X, Y, Z, W), true, X, Y, V, U, Z, W) = fresh3(equidistant(X, Y, V, U), true, V, U, Z, W).
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  Goal 1 (prove_symmetry): equidistant(w, x, u, v) = true.
% 0.20/0.42  Proof:
% 0.20/0.42    equidistant(w, x, u, v)
% 0.20/0.42  = { by axiom 4 (transitivity_for_equidistance) R->L }
% 0.20/0.42    fresh4(true, true, u, v, w, x, u, v)
% 0.20/0.42  = { by axiom 1 (d1) R->L }
% 0.20/0.42    fresh4(equidistant(u, v, u, v), true, u, v, w, x, u, v)
% 0.20/0.42  = { by axiom 5 (transitivity_for_equidistance) }
% 0.20/0.42    fresh3(equidistant(u, v, w, x), true, w, x, u, v)
% 0.20/0.42  = { by axiom 2 (u_to_v_equals_w_to_x) }
% 0.20/0.42    fresh3(true, true, w, x, u, v)
% 0.20/0.42  = { by axiom 3 (transitivity_for_equidistance) }
% 0.20/0.42    true
% 0.20/0.42  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.42  
% 0.20/0.42  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------