TSTP Solution File: GEO015-3 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : GEO015-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 04:07:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.14  % Problem  : GEO015-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.09/0.15  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 01:40:04 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.40  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.40  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.16/0.40  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.16/0.40  #
% 0.16/0.40  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.40  # Number of axioms: 21 Number of unprocessed: 21
% 0.16/0.40  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.16/0.40  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.16/0.40  # Hello from C++
% 0.16/0.40  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.16/0.40  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.16/0.40  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.16/0.40  # 21 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.16/0.40  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.16/0.40  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.16/0.40  # Found 9 unit axioms.
% 0.16/0.40  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.16/0.40  # 12 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.16/0.40  # 9 unit axiom clauses
% 0.16/0.40  
% 0.16/0.40  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.16/0.40  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.23/0.43  # There were 21 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.23/0.43  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.23/0.43  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.23/0.43  # There were 13 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.23/0.43  # There were 21 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.23/0.43  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.23/0.43  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.23/0.43  # There were 8 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.23/0.43  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.43  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.43  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.23/0.43  
% 0.23/0.43  # End clausification derivation
% 0.23/0.43  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_41, hypothesis, (equidistant(u,v,w,x))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X2,X1))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X1,X2))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (between(X1,X2,extension(X1,X2,X3,X4)))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (equidistant(X1,extension(X2,X1,X3,X4),X3,X4))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (~equidistant(w,x,u,v))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (~between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (X1=X2|~between(X1,X2,X1))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (X1=X2|~equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X3))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X5,X6,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X5,X6,X1,X2))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (between(X1,inner_pasch(X2,X3,X4,X1,X5),X2)|~between(X5,X1,X4)|~between(X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (between(X1,inner_pasch(X2,X1,X3,X4,X5),X5)|~between(X5,X4,X3)|~between(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (X1=X2|between(X1,X3,euclid2(X1,X4,X2,X3,X5))|~between(X4,X2,X3)|~between(X1,X2,X5))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (X1=X2|between(X1,X3,euclid1(X1,X3,X2,X4,X5))|~between(X3,X2,X4)|~between(X1,X2,X5))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (X1=X2|between(X3,X4,X5)|between(X4,X5,X3)|between(X5,X3,X4)|~equidistant(X5,X1,X5,X2)|~equidistant(X4,X1,X4,X2)|~equidistant(X3,X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (X1=X2|between(euclid1(X1,X3,X2,X4,X5),X5,euclid2(X1,X3,X2,X4,X5))|~between(X3,X2,X4)|~between(X1,X2,X5))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (equidistant(X1,X2,X1,continuous(X1,X3,X4,X2,X5,X6))|~between(X3,X2,X5)|~between(X1,X3,X5)|~equidistant(X1,X5,X1,X6)|~equidistant(X1,X3,X1,X4))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (between(X1,continuous(X2,X3,X1,X4,X5,X6),X6)|~between(X3,X4,X5)|~between(X2,X3,X5)|~equidistant(X2,X5,X2,X6)|~equidistant(X2,X3,X2,X1))).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (X1=X2|equidistant(X3,X4,X5,X6)|~between(X7,X8,X5)|~between(X1,X2,X3)|~equidistant(X2,X4,X8,X6)|~equidistant(X2,X3,X8,X5)|~equidistant(X1,X4,X7,X6)|~equidistant(X1,X2,X7,X8))).
% 0.23/0.43  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.23/0.43  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.23/0.43  # Found 15 steps
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (~equidistant(w,x,u,v)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (~equidistant(w,x,u,v)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_90, plain, (~equidistant(v,x,x,v)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_92, plain, (~equidistant(v,x,x,v)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (~between(x,x,u)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_34])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_169, plain, (~equidistant(x,x,x,x)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_170, plain, (~equidistant(u,x,u,x)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_40])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_171, plain, (~equidistant(x,x,x,x)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_86, plain, (v=v), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_86, ...])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_89, plain, (~between(v,v,w)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_89, ...])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_91, plain, (~equidistant(v,w,x,u)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_91, ...])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_93, plain, (~equidistant(v,v,x,x)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_93, ...])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_165, plain, (x=x), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_165, ...])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_166, plain, (between(x,u,x)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_166, ...])).
% 0.23/0.43  cnf(i_0_167, plain, (between(u,x,x)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_167, ...])).
% 0.23/0.43  # End printing tableau
% 0.23/0.43  # SZS output end
% 0.23/0.43  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.23/0.43  # Returning from population with 4 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.23/0.43  # We now have 4 tableaux to operate on
% 0.23/0.43  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.23/0.43  # Proof search is over...
% 0.23/0.43  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------