TSTP Solution File: GEO015-3 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : GEO015-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:42:25 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GEO015-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.15/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 20:57:02 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.60 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.69 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.69 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.69 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.69 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.69 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.69
% 0.20/0.69 % Result :Theorem 0.030000s
% 0.20/0.69 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.030000s
% 0.20/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.69 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.69 % File : GEO015-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.20/0.69 % Domain : Geometry
% 0.20/0.69 % Problem : Equidistance is symmetric between its argument pairs
% 0.20/0.69 % Version : [Qua89] axioms : Augmented.
% 0.20/0.69 % English : Show that if the distance from A to B equals the distance
% 0.20/0.69 % from C to D, then the distance from C to D equals the
% 0.20/0.69 % distance from A to B.
% 0.20/0.69
% 0.20/0.69 % Refs : [SST83] Schwabbauser et al. (1983), Metamathematische Methoden
% 0.20/0.69 % : [Qua89] Quaife (1989), Automated Development of Tarski's Geome
% 0.20/0.69 % Source : [Qua89]
% 0.20/0.69 % Names : D2 [Qua89]
% 0.20/0.69
% 0.20/0.69 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.69 % Rating : 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.2.0, 0.10 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.10 v5.3.0, 0.11 v5.2.0, 0.12 v5.1.0, 0.06 v5.0.0, 0.00 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0, 0.00 v3.1.0, 0.09 v2.7.0, 0.08 v2.6.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.20/0.69 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 9 unt; 5 nHn; 17 RR)
% 0.20/0.69 % Number of literals : 59 ( 7 equ; 35 neg)
% 0.20/0.69 % Maximal clause size : 8 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.69 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.69 % Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 0 prp; 2-4 aty)
% 0.20/0.69 % Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 7 con; 0-6 aty)
% 0.20/0.69 % Number of variables : 73 ( 3 sgn)
% 0.20/0.69 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 0.20/0.69
% 0.20/0.69 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.69 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.69 %----Include Tarski geometry axioms
% 0.20/0.69 include('Axioms/GEO002-0.ax').
% 0.20/0.69 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(d1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.69 equidistant(U,V,U,V) ).
% 0.20/0.69
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(u_to_v_equals_w_to_x,hypothesis,
% 0.20/0.69 equidistant(u,v,w,x) ).
% 0.20/0.69
% 0.20/0.69 cnf(prove_symmetry,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.69 ~ equidistant(w,x,u,v) ).
% 0.20/0.69
% 0.20/0.69 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.69 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.69 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.69 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.69 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.69 %ClaNum:56(EqnAxiom:35)
% 0.20/0.69 %VarNum:215(SingletonVarNum:73)
% 0.20/0.69 %MaxLitNum:8
% 0.20/0.69 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.69 %SharedTerms:12
% 0.20/0.69 %goalClause: 44
% 0.20/0.69 %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.69 [36]P1(a1,a10,a11,a12)
% 0.20/0.69 [41]~P2(a6,a8,a9)
% 0.20/0.69 [42]~P2(a8,a9,a6)
% 0.20/0.69 [43]~P2(a9,a6,a8)
% 0.20/0.69 [44]~P1(a11,a12,a1,a10)
% 0.20/0.69 [37]P1(x371,x372,x372,x371)
% 0.20/0.69 [38]P1(x381,x382,x381,x382)
% 0.20/0.69 [39]P2(x391,x392,f2(x391,x392,x393,x394))
% 0.20/0.69 [40]P1(x401,f2(x402,x401,x403,x404),x403,x404)
% 0.20/0.69 [45]~P2(x451,x452,x451)+E(x451,x452)
% 0.20/0.69 [46]~P1(x461,x462,x463,x463)+E(x461,x462)
% 0.20/0.69 [50]~P2(x505,x501,x504)+~P2(x502,x503,x504)+P2(x501,f7(x502,x503,x504,x501,x505),x502)
% 0.20/0.69 [51]~P2(x515,x514,x513)+~P2(x512,x511,x513)+P2(x511,f7(x512,x511,x513,x514,x515),x515)
% 0.20/0.69 [47]~P1(x475,x476,x471,x472)+P1(x471,x472,x473,x474)+~P1(x475,x476,x473,x474)
% 0.20/0.69 [52]~P2(x524,x522,x523)+~P2(x521,x522,x525)+E(x521,x522)+P2(x521,x523,f3(x521,x524,x522,x523,x525))
% 0.20/0.69 [53]~P2(x533,x532,x534)+~P2(x531,x532,x535)+E(x531,x532)+P2(x531,x533,f4(x531,x533,x532,x534,x535))
% 0.20/0.70 [54]~P2(x543,x542,x544)+~P2(x541,x542,x545)+E(x541,x542)+P2(f4(x541,x543,x542,x544,x545),x545,f3(x541,x543,x542,x544,x545))
% 0.20/0.70 [55]~P2(x553,x554,x555)+~P2(x552,x553,x555)+~P1(x552,x555,x552,x556)+~P1(x552,x553,x552,x551)+P2(x551,f5(x552,x553,x551,x554,x555,x556),x556)
% 0.20/0.70 [56]~P2(x563,x562,x565)+~P2(x561,x563,x565)+~P1(x561,x565,x561,x566)+~P1(x561,x563,x561,x564)+P1(x561,x562,x561,f5(x561,x563,x564,x562,x565,x566))
% 0.20/0.70 [48]P2(x485,x483,x484)+P2(x484,x485,x483)+~P1(x483,x481,x483,x482)+~P1(x485,x481,x485,x482)+~P1(x484,x481,x484,x482)+E(x481,x482)+P2(x483,x484,x485)
% 0.20/0.70 [49]~P2(x491,x492,x493)+~P1(x492,x494,x498,x496)+~P1(x492,x493,x498,x495)+~P1(x491,x494,x497,x496)+~P1(x491,x492,x497,x498)+E(x491,x492)+P1(x493,x494,x495,x496)+~P2(x497,x498,x495)
% 0.20/0.70 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.70 [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.20/0.70 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.20/0.70 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.20/0.70 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41,x43,x44,x45),f2(x42,x43,x44,x45))
% 0.20/0.70 [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x53,x51,x54,x55),f2(x53,x52,x54,x55))
% 0.20/0.70 [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f2(x63,x64,x61,x65),f2(x63,x64,x62,x65))
% 0.20/0.70 [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f2(x73,x74,x75,x71),f2(x73,x74,x75,x72))
% 0.20/0.70 [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f5(x81,x83,x84,x85,x86,x87),f5(x82,x83,x84,x85,x86,x87))
% 0.20/0.70 [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f5(x93,x91,x94,x95,x96,x97),f5(x93,x92,x94,x95,x96,x97))
% 0.20/0.70 [10]~E(x101,x102)+E(f5(x103,x104,x101,x105,x106,x107),f5(x103,x104,x102,x105,x106,x107))
% 0.20/0.70 [11]~E(x111,x112)+E(f5(x113,x114,x115,x111,x116,x117),f5(x113,x114,x115,x112,x116,x117))
% 0.20/0.70 [12]~E(x121,x122)+E(f5(x123,x124,x125,x126,x121,x127),f5(x123,x124,x125,x126,x122,x127))
% 0.20/0.70 [13]~E(x131,x132)+E(f5(x133,x134,x135,x136,x137,x131),f5(x133,x134,x135,x136,x137,x132))
% 0.20/0.70 [14]~E(x141,x142)+E(f7(x141,x143,x144,x145,x146),f7(x142,x143,x144,x145,x146))
% 0.20/0.70 [15]~E(x151,x152)+E(f7(x153,x151,x154,x155,x156),f7(x153,x152,x154,x155,x156))
% 0.20/0.70 [16]~E(x161,x162)+E(f7(x163,x164,x161,x165,x166),f7(x163,x164,x162,x165,x166))
% 0.20/0.70 [17]~E(x171,x172)+E(f7(x173,x174,x175,x171,x176),f7(x173,x174,x175,x172,x176))
% 0.20/0.70 [18]~E(x181,x182)+E(f7(x183,x184,x185,x186,x181),f7(x183,x184,x185,x186,x182))
% 0.20/0.70 [19]~E(x191,x192)+E(f3(x191,x193,x194,x195,x196),f3(x192,x193,x194,x195,x196))
% 0.20/0.70 [20]~E(x201,x202)+E(f3(x203,x201,x204,x205,x206),f3(x203,x202,x204,x205,x206))
% 0.20/0.70 [21]~E(x211,x212)+E(f3(x213,x214,x211,x215,x216),f3(x213,x214,x212,x215,x216))
% 0.20/0.70 [22]~E(x221,x222)+E(f3(x223,x224,x225,x221,x226),f3(x223,x224,x225,x222,x226))
% 0.20/0.70 [23]~E(x231,x232)+E(f3(x233,x234,x235,x236,x231),f3(x233,x234,x235,x236,x232))
% 0.20/0.70 [24]~E(x241,x242)+E(f4(x241,x243,x244,x245,x246),f4(x242,x243,x244,x245,x246))
% 0.20/0.70 [25]~E(x251,x252)+E(f4(x253,x251,x254,x255,x256),f4(x253,x252,x254,x255,x256))
% 0.20/0.70 [26]~E(x261,x262)+E(f4(x263,x264,x261,x265,x266),f4(x263,x264,x262,x265,x266))
% 0.20/0.70 [27]~E(x271,x272)+E(f4(x273,x274,x275,x271,x276),f4(x273,x274,x275,x272,x276))
% 0.20/0.70 [28]~E(x281,x282)+E(f4(x283,x284,x285,x286,x281),f4(x283,x284,x285,x286,x282))
% 0.20/0.70 [29]P1(x292,x293,x294,x295)+~E(x291,x292)+~P1(x291,x293,x294,x295)
% 0.20/0.70 [30]P1(x303,x302,x304,x305)+~E(x301,x302)+~P1(x303,x301,x304,x305)
% 0.20/0.70 [31]P1(x313,x314,x312,x315)+~E(x311,x312)+~P1(x313,x314,x311,x315)
% 0.20/0.70 [32]P1(x323,x324,x325,x322)+~E(x321,x322)+~P1(x323,x324,x325,x321)
% 0.20/0.70 [33]P2(x332,x333,x334)+~E(x331,x332)+~P2(x331,x333,x334)
% 0.20/0.70 [34]P2(x343,x342,x344)+~E(x341,x342)+~P2(x343,x341,x344)
% 0.20/0.70 [35]P2(x353,x354,x352)+~E(x351,x352)+~P2(x353,x354,x351)
% 0.20/0.70
% 0.20/0.70 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(60,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 (P1(x601,f2(x602,x601,x603,x604),x603,x604)),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(rename_variables,[],[40])).
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(62,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 (P1(x621,f2(x622,x621,x623,x624),x623,x624)),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(rename_variables,[],[40])).
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(84,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 (E(f5(x841,x842,x843,x844,x845,x846),f5(x841,x842,x843,x844,x845,f2(x847,x846,x848,x848)))),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[44,37,41,40,60,62,39,35,30,47,2,46,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,14,13])).
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(85,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 (E(f5(x851,x852,x853,x854,x855,x856),f5(x851,x852,x853,x854,f2(x857,x855,x858,x858),x856))),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[44,37,41,40,60,62,39,35,30,47,2,46,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,14,13,12])).
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(96,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 (~E(f2(x961,f2(a6,a8,x962,x963),x964,x964),a9)),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[44,37,41,40,60,62,39,35,30,47,2,46,28,27,26,25,24,23,22,21,20,19,18,17,16,15,14,13,12,11,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,34,29,3])).
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(126,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 (P1(x1261,x1262,x1261,x1262)),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(rename_variables,[],[38])).
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(127,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 (P2(x1271,x1272,f2(x1271,x1272,x1273,x1274))),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(rename_variables,[],[39])).
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(128,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 (P1(x1281,f2(x1282,x1281,x1283,x1284),x1283,x1284)),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(rename_variables,[],[40])).
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(132,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 (P2(x1321,x1322,f2(x1321,x1322,x1323,x1324))),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(rename_variables,[],[39])).
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(134,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 (P1(x1341,x1342,x1341,x1342)),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(rename_variables,[],[38])).
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(140,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 (P1(x1401,x1402,x1401,x1402)),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(rename_variables,[],[38])).
% 0.20/0.70 cnf(144,plain,
% 0.20/0.70 ($false),
% 0.20/0.70 inference(scs_inference,[],[44,38,126,134,140,36,42,40,128,39,127,132,84,85,96,46,51,55,2,35,29,3,56,47]),
% 0.20/0.70 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.70 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.70 % Total time :0.030000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------