TSTP Solution File: GEO011-5 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO011-5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:53 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.14s 1.81s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   9 unt;   9 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (   8   ~;   8   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   19 (   6   >;  13   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    6 (;   6   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ colinear > between > equal_distance > inner_pasch > extension > distance > #nlpp > lower_dimension_point_3 > lower_dimension_point_2 > lower_dimension_point_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(lower_dimension_point_1,type,
    lower_dimension_point_1: $i ).

tff(lower_dimension_point_2,type,
    lower_dimension_point_2: $i ).

tff(distance,type,
    distance: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(colinear,type,
    colinear: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(lower_dimension_point_3,type,
    lower_dimension_point_3: $i ).

tff(extension,type,
    extension: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(equal_distance,type,
    equal_distance: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(between,type,
    between: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(inner_pasch,type,
    inner_pasch: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_152,axiom,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_155,axiom,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_158,axiom,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_159,axiom,
    colinear(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_73,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ~ colinear(X,Y,Z)
      | between(X,Y,Z)
      | between(Y,Z,X)
      | between(Z,X,Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_152]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_155]) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_158]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    colinear(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_159]) ).

tff(c_82,plain,
    ! [Z_83,X_84,Y_85] :
      ( between(Z_83,X_84,Y_85)
      | between(Y_85,Z_83,X_84)
      | between(X_84,Y_85,Z_83)
      | ~ colinear(X_84,Y_85,Z_83) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_73]) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    ( between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2)
    | between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1)
    | between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_82]) ).

tff(c_101,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_30,c_32,c_94]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : GEO011-5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:11:18 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.14/1.81  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.14/1.81  
% 3.14/1.81  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.14/1.84  
% 3.14/1.84  Inference rules
% 3.14/1.84  ----------------------
% 3.14/1.84  #Ref     : 0
% 3.14/1.84  #Sup     : 12
% 3.14/1.84  #Fact    : 0
% 3.14/1.84  #Define  : 0
% 3.14/1.84  #Split   : 0
% 3.14/1.84  #Chain   : 0
% 3.14/1.84  #Close   : 0
% 3.14/1.84  
% 3.14/1.84  Ordering : KBO
% 3.14/1.84  
% 3.14/1.84  Simplification rules
% 3.14/1.84  ----------------------
% 3.14/1.84  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.14/1.84  #Demod        : 0
% 3.14/1.84  #Tautology    : 8
% 3.14/1.84  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 3.14/1.84  #BackRed      : 0
% 3.14/1.84  
% 3.14/1.84  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.14/1.84  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.14/1.84  
% 3.14/1.84  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.14/1.84  ----------------------
% 3.14/1.84  Preprocessing        : 0.50
% 3.14/1.84  Parsing              : 0.24
% 3.14/1.84  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 3.14/1.84  Main loop            : 0.23
% 3.14/1.84  Inferencing          : 0.10
% 3.14/1.84  Reduction            : 0.06
% 3.14/1.84  Demodulation         : 0.04
% 3.14/1.84  BG Simplification    : 0.01
% 3.14/1.84  Subsumption          : 0.05
% 3.14/1.84  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.14/1.84  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.14/1.84  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.14/1.84  Total                : 0.77
% 3.14/1.84  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.14/1.84  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.14/1.84  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.14/1.84  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------