TSTP Solution File: GEO011-3 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : GEO011-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:13:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.42s 0.59s
% Output : Refutation 0.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 5 unt; 1 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 9 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(lower_dimension1,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',lower_dimension1) ).
cnf(lower_dimension2,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',lower_dimension2) ).
cnf(lower_dimension3,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-0.ax',lower_dimension3) ).
cnf(colinearity4,axiom,
( ~ colinear(X,Y,Z)
| between(X,Y,Z)
| between(Y,Z,X)
| between(Z,X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GEO002-1.ax',colinearity4) ).
cnf(prove_lower_dimension_points_not_colinear,negated_conjecture,
colinear(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_lower_dimension_points_not_colinear) ).
cnf(251,plain,
$false,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[colinearity4,prove_lower_dimension_points_not_colinear,lower_dimension1,lower_dimension2,lower_dimension3]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : GEO011-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 11:29:54 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.46 *
% 0.20/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 "."
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T11:29:54
% 0.20/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n026.cluster.edu at 2022-06-18T11:29:54
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 ; Recognized relation function assertion (|between| ?X ?Y (|reflection| ?X ?Y)).
% 0.20/0.50 ; Recognized commutativity assertion (OR (NOT (|colinear| ?X ?Y ?Z)) (|colinear| ?Y ?X ?Z)).
% 0.42/0.59 ; Declaring colinear to be commutative.
% 0.42/0.59
% 0.42/0.59 #||
% 0.42/0.59 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.42/0.59 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.42/0.59 ||#
% 0.42/0.59
% 0.42/0.59 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.42/0.59 ; 909 formulas have been input or derived (from 56 formulas).
% 0.42/0.59 ; 251 (28%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.42/0.59 ; 8 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.42/0.59 ; 243 (97%) are still being kept.
% 0.42/0.59 ;
% 0.42/0.59 ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.022 19% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.004 3% Assert (96 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.020 17% Process new row (776 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.016 14% Resolution (110 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.002 2% Paramodulation (55 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Factoring (1 call)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.004 3% Condensing (86 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.001 1% Forward subsumption (86 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.001 1% Backward subsumption (76 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.005 4% Clause clause subsumption (338 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.010 8% Forward simplification (776 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.004 3% Backward simplification (245 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Ordering (109 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.001 1% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.028 24% Other
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.118 Total
% 0.42/0.59 ; 0.119 Real time
% 0.42/0.59 ;
% 0.42/0.59 ; Term-hash-array has 378 terms in all.
% 0.42/0.59 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 76 entries (76 at peak, 76 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.42/0.59 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 140 nodes (140 at peak, 140 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.42/0.59 ; Retrieved 250 possibly forward subsuming rows in 86 calls.
% 0.42/0.59 ; Retrieved 161 possibly backward subsumed rows in 76 calls.
% 0.42/0.59 ; Path-index has 377 entries (377 at peak, 381 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.42/0.59 ; Path-index has 845 nodes (845 at peak, 852 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.42/0.59 ; Trie-index has 377 entries (377 at peak, 381 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.42/0.59 ; Trie-index has 1,250 nodes (1,250 at peak, 1,263 added, 13 deleted).
% 0.42/0.59 ; Retrieved 2,356 generalization terms in 1,426 calls.
% 0.42/0.59 ; Retrieved 329 instance terms in 168 calls.
% 0.42/0.59 ; Retrieved 18,969 unifiable terms in 804 calls.
% 0.42/0.59 ;
% 0.42/0.59 ; The agenda of rows to process has 8 entries:
% 0.42/0.59 ; 6 with value 6 2 with value 16
% 0.42/0.59 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 28 entries:
% 0.42/0.59 ; 3 with value 20 1 with value 26 1 with value 35
% 0.42/0.59 ; 3 with value 21 1 with value 27 1 with value 37
% 0.42/0.59 ; 1 with value 23 4 with value 28 2 with value 40
% 0.42/0.59 ; 4 with value 24 1 with value 30 1 with value 44
% 0.42/0.59 ; 3 with value 25 1 with value 34 1 with value 49
% 0.42/0.59 ; The agenda of rows to give has 159 entries:
% 0.42/0.59 ; 13 with value (4 6) 8 with value (4 14) 5 with value (4 23)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 12 with value (4 7) 10 with value (4 15) 3 with value (4 25)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 6 with value (4 8) 6 with value (4 16) 1 with value (4 27)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 14 with value (4 9) 4 with value (4 17) 1 with value (4 28)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 11 with value (4 10) 5 with value (4 18) 1 with value (4 29)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 17 with value (4 11) 9 with value (4 19) 2 with value (4 32)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 18 with value (4 12) 6 with value (4 20) 1 with value (4 36)
% 0.42/0.59 ; 2 with value (4 13) 4 with value (4 21)
% 0.42/0.59 Evaluation took:
% 0.42/0.59 0.119 seconds of real time
% 0.42/0.59 0.10711 seconds of user run time
% 0.42/0.59 0.011436 seconds of system run time
% 0.42/0.59 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.42/0.59 0 page faults and
% 0.42/0.59 6,096,568 bytes consed.
% 0.42/0.59 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.59 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-18T11:29:55
% 0.42/0.59 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.42/0.59 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------