TSTP Solution File: GEO011-3 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : GEO011-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:33:23 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 17 ( 0 equ; 8 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(colinearity4,axiom,
( between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X2,X3,X1)
| between(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9G9YlW37ak/E---3.1_22233.p',colinearity4) ).
cnf(prove_lower_dimension_points_not_colinear,negated_conjecture,
colinear(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9G9YlW37ak/E---3.1_22233.p',prove_lower_dimension_points_not_colinear) ).
cnf(lower_dimension1,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9G9YlW37ak/E---3.1_22233.p',lower_dimension1) ).
cnf(lower_dimension2,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9G9YlW37ak/E---3.1_22233.p',lower_dimension2) ).
cnf(lower_dimension3,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9G9YlW37ak/E---3.1_22233.p',lower_dimension3) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( between(X1,X2,X3)
| between(X2,X3,X1)
| between(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ colinear(X1,X2,X3) ),
colinearity4 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
colinear(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
prove_lower_dimension_points_not_colinear ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3),
lower_dimension1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_2,lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1),
lower_dimension2 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
~ between(lower_dimension_point_3,lower_dimension_point_1,lower_dimension_point_2),
lower_dimension3 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),c_0_8]),c_0_9]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.09 % Problem : GEO011-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.05/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Tue Oct 3 07:05:07 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9G9YlW37ak/E---3.1_22233.p
% 0.15/0.42 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 22311 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 901s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting new_bool_3 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 146s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with pid 22319 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 901s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0a with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.42 # Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses : 96
% 0.15/0.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 93
% 0.15/0.42 # Processed clauses : 59
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 54
% 0.15/0.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Generated clauses : 123
% 0.15/0.42 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 79
% 0.15/0.42 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Paramodulations : 119
% 0.15/0.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.15/0.42 # Total rewrite steps : 41
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 51
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 34
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 113
% 0.15/0.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 261
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.15/0.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 271
% 0.15/0.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 266
% 0.15/0.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.15/0.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.15/0.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 36
% 0.15/0.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2452
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1816 pages
% 0.15/0.42
% 0.15/0.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.42 # User time : 0.020 s
% 0.15/0.42 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Total time : 0.030 s
% 0.15/0.42 # Maximum resident set size: 1744 pages
% 0.15/0.42 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------