TSTP Solution File: GEO007-3 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : GEO007-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 20:00:03 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 17 unt; 5 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 6 equ; 19 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(t1,axiom,
( between(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t1) ).
cnf(b13,axiom,
( X1 = X2
| between(X2,X3,X4)
| between(X2,X4,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b13) ).
cnf(a_between_a_and_e,hypothesis,
between(e,a,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_between_a_and_e) ).
cnf(a_not_c,hypothesis,
a != c,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_not_c) ).
cnf(a_between_a_and_c,hypothesis,
between(d,a,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_between_a_and_c) ).
cnf(e_not_between_d_and_a,hypothesis,
~ between(d,e,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',e_not_between_d_and_a) ).
cnf(prove_d_between_e_and_a,negated_conjecture,
~ between(e,d,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_d_between_e_and_a) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( between(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t1]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( X1 = X2
| between(X2,X3,X4)
| between(X2,X4,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[b13]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( between(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
between(e,a,c),
a_between_a_and_e ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
a != c,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a_not_c]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( X1 = X2
| between(X2,X3,X4)
| between(X2,X4,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ between(X1,X2,X4) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
between(c,a,e),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
a != c,
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
between(d,a,c),
a_between_a_and_c ).
cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
( between(a,X1,e)
| between(a,e,X1)
| ~ between(c,a,X1) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
between(c,a,d),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
~ between(d,e,a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[e_not_between_d_and_a]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
( between(a,e,d)
| between(a,d,e) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
~ between(d,e,a),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ between(e,d,a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_d_between_e_and_a]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
between(a,d,e),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
~ between(e,d,a),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : GEO007-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.06/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 14:21:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 26989 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(2): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with pid 26992 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Result found by G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50 # Search class: FGUSM-FFMF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # partial match(2): FGUSM-FFMF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50 # Starting G-E--_215_C46_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 83
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 38
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses : 45
% 0.20/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 44
% 0.20/0.50 # Processed clauses : 113
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.20/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 109
% 0.20/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Generated clauses : 126
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 53
% 0.20/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Paramodulations : 125
% 0.20/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 66
% 0.20/0.50 # ...of those cached : 46
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 66
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.20/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 49
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21
% 0.20/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 96
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 43
% 0.20/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1533
% 0.20/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1177
% 0.20/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.20/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.20/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 33
% 0.20/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3170
% 0.20/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 284
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1884 pages
% 0.20/0.50
% 0.20/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50 # User time : 0.012 s
% 0.20/0.50 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.20/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages
% 0.20/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------