TSTP Solution File: GEO006-3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO006-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.54s 2.74s
% Output   : Refutation 2.54s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GEO006-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 14:41:03 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.38  The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.38  Sat Jun 18 14:41:03 2022
% 0.13/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 11631.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.38  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.38  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.38  clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.38     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [demod,68] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,A,B)).
% 0.13/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 66 during input processing: 0 [demod,68] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,B,A),B,A).
% 0.13/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.38  64 back subsumes 61.
% 0.13/0.38  69 back subsumes 57.
% 0.13/0.38  69 back subsumes 44.
% 0.13/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [copy,74,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.38  74 back subsumes 60.
% 0.13/0.38  74 back subsumes 59.
% 0.13/0.38  74 back subsumes 58.
% 0.13/0.38  75 back subsumes 45.
% 0.13/0.38  82 back subsumes 49.
% 0.13/0.38  82 back subsumes 48.
% 0.13/0.38  83 back subsumes 50.
% 0.13/0.38  
% 0.13/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.82/1.01  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.82/1.01  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.82/1.01  number of clauses in intial UL: 45
% 0.82/1.01  number of clauses initially in problem: 64
% 0.82/1.01  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 70
% 0.82/1.01  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.82/1.01  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.82/1.01  absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.82/1.01     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.82/1.01     distinct function count: 6
% 0.82/1.01     distinct constant count: 6
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.82/1.01  
% 0.82/1.01  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.54/2.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.54/2.74  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  Model 3 [ 2 24 105396 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  Model 4 [ 4 20 85680 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  Model 5 [ 2 21 95124 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   2.34 sec ----> 572 [binary,570.1,43.1] {-} $F.
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.54/2.74  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.54/2.74  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  36 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(B,A,C)|A=B.
% 2.54/2.74  37 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(A,C,B)|B=C.
% 2.54/2.74  38 [] {-} a!=c.
% 2.54/2.74  39 [copy,38,flip.1] {+} c!=a.
% 2.54/2.74  42 [] {-} c!=d.
% 2.54/2.74  43 [copy,42,flip.1] {+} d!=c.
% 2.54/2.74  84 [] {-} between(a,c,d).
% 2.54/2.74  85 [] {-} between(c,a,d)|between(a,d,c).
% 2.54/2.74  562 [hyper,85,36,84,unit_del,39] {-} between(a,d,c).
% 2.54/2.74  570 [hyper,562,37,84,flip.1] {-} d=c.
% 2.54/2.74  572 [binary,570.1,43.1] {-} $F.
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.54/2.74  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  ============ end of search ============
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  true clauses given           4      (26.7%)
% 2.54/2.74  false clauses given         11
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.54/2.74     4  1         0
% 2.54/2.74     7  0         1
% 2.54/2.74     8  6         2
% 2.54/2.74     9  42        14
% 2.54/2.74    10  2         9
% 2.54/2.74    11  8         9
% 2.54/2.74    12  26        4
% 2.54/2.74    13  5         6
% 2.54/2.74    14  7         5
% 2.54/2.74    15  22        3
% 2.54/2.74    16  4         7
% 2.54/2.74    17  12        6
% 2.54/2.74    18  5         5
% 2.54/2.74    19  0         5
% 2.54/2.74    20  24        12
% 2.54/2.74    21  15        3
% 2.54/2.74    22  7         5
% 2.54/2.74    23  21        11
% 2.54/2.74    24  17        1
% 2.54/2.74    25  4         6
% 2.54/2.74    26  8         7
% 2.54/2.74    27  7         1
% 2.54/2.74    28  1         14
% 2.54/2.74    29  11        4
% 2.54/2.74    30  2         1
% 2.54/2.74    31  8         1
% 2.54/2.74    33  0         3
% 2.54/2.74    34  11        0
% 2.54/2.74    35  0         1
% 2.54/2.74    36  1         1
% 2.54/2.74    37  6         1
% 2.54/2.74    38  0         1
% 2.54/2.74    39  2         1
% 2.54/2.74    40  8         0
% 2.54/2.74    42  1         1
% 2.54/2.74    43  1         1
% 2.54/2.74    44  1         0
% 2.54/2.74    45  0         1
% 2.54/2.74    46  1         0
% 2.54/2.74    47  1         0
% 2.54/2.74    49  0         1
% 2.54/2.74    50  1         0
% 2.54/2.74  tot:  299       154      (34.0% true)
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  Model 5 [ 2 -20 95124 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.54/2.74  
% 2.54/2.74  Process 11631 finished Sat Jun 18 14:41:06 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------