TSTP Solution File: GEO005-2 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO005-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s 300.23s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : GEO005-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 17:16:59 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.34  The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.34  Sat Jun 18 17:16:59 2022
% 0.11/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 23323.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  list(usable).
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.11/0.34  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.11/0.34  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.11/0.34  clauses in usable.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.11/0.34     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.34  35 back subsumes 32.
% 0.11/0.34    Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [copy,38,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.11/0.34  
% 0.11/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.13/1.32  
% 1.13/1.32  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.13/1.32  
% 1.13/1.32  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.13/1.32  
% 1.13/1.32  
% 1.13/1.32  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.13/1.32  
% 1.13/1.32  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.13/1.32  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.13/1.32  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.13/1.32  number of clauses in intial UL: 33
% 1.13/1.32  number of clauses initially in problem: 37
% 1.13/1.32  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 89
% 1.13/1.32  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 92
% 1.13/1.32  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 1.13/1.32  absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 1.13/1.32     distinct predicate count: 3
% 1.13/1.32     distinct function count: 6
% 1.13/1.32     distinct constant count: 5
% 1.13/1.32  
% 1.13/1.32  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.13/1.32  
% 1.13/1.32  
% 1.13/1.32  
% 1.13/1.32  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.13/1.32  
% 1.13/1.32  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.13/1.32  
% 1.13/1.32  =========== start of search ===========
% 300.04/300.23  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------