TSTP Solution File: GEO002-3 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GEO002-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:50 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.90s 1.89s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.96s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   6 unt;  13 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   10 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   4   ~;   2   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   34 (   8   >;  26   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-6 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (;  12   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ equidistant > between > continuous > inner_pasch > euclid2 > euclid1 > extension > reflection > #nlpp > lower_dimension_point_3 > lower_dimension_point_2 > lower_dimension_point_1 > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(lower_dimension_point_1,type,
    lower_dimension_point_1: $i ).

tff(euclid2,type,
    euclid2: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(lower_dimension_point_2,type,
    lower_dimension_point_2: $i ).

tff(equidistant,type,
    equidistant: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(lower_dimension_point_3,type,
    lower_dimension_point_3: $i ).

tff(extension,type,
    extension: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(reflection,type,
    reflection: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(euclid1,type,
    euclid1: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(between,type,
    between: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(inner_pasch,type,
    inner_pasch: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(continuous,type,
    continuous: ( $i * $i * $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_369,axiom,
    ! [U,V] : between(U,V,V),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_382,axiom,
    ! [U,V,W] :
      ( ~ between(U,V,W)
      | between(W,V,U) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_384,axiom,
    ~ between(a,a,b),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_88,plain,
    ! [U_154,V_155] : between(U_154,V_155,V_155),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_369]) ).

tff(c_238,plain,
    ! [W_194,V_195,U_196] :
      ( between(W_194,V_195,U_196)
      | ~ between(U_196,V_195,W_194) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_382]) ).

tff(c_249,plain,
    ! [V_155,U_154] : between(V_155,V_155,U_154),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_88,c_238]) ).

tff(c_94,plain,
    ~ between(a,a,b),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_384]) ).

tff(c_252,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_249,c_94]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GEO002-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug  4 00:38:48 EDT 2023
% 0.20/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.90/1.89  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.91/1.89  
% 3.91/1.89  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.96/1.92  
% 3.96/1.92  Inference rules
% 3.96/1.92  ----------------------
% 3.96/1.92  #Ref     : 0
% 3.96/1.92  #Sup     : 31
% 3.96/1.92  #Fact    : 0
% 3.96/1.92  #Define  : 0
% 3.96/1.92  #Split   : 0
% 3.96/1.92  #Chain   : 0
% 3.96/1.92  #Close   : 0
% 3.96/1.92  
% 3.96/1.92  Ordering : KBO
% 3.96/1.92  
% 3.96/1.92  Simplification rules
% 3.96/1.92  ----------------------
% 3.96/1.92  #Subsume      : 0
% 3.96/1.92  #Demod        : 19
% 3.96/1.92  #Tautology    : 31
% 3.96/1.92  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 3.96/1.92  #BackRed      : 1
% 3.96/1.92  
% 3.96/1.92  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.96/1.92  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 3.96/1.92  
% 3.96/1.92  Timing (in seconds)
% 3.96/1.92  ----------------------
% 3.96/1.92  Preprocessing        : 0.60
% 3.96/1.92  Parsing              : 0.28
% 3.96/1.92  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 3.96/1.92  Main loop            : 0.27
% 3.96/1.92  Inferencing          : 0.07
% 3.96/1.92  Reduction            : 0.09
% 3.96/1.92  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 3.96/1.92  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 3.96/1.92  Subsumption          : 0.07
% 3.96/1.92  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 3.96/1.92  MUC search           : 0.00
% 3.96/1.92  Cooper               : 0.00
% 3.96/1.92  Total                : 0.91
% 3.96/1.92  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 3.96/1.92  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 3.96/1.92  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 3.96/1.92  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------