TSTP Solution File: GEO001-4 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GEO001-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.21s 2.44s
% Output   : Refutation 2.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GEO001-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 21:34:16 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35  Fri Jun 17 21:34:16 2022
% 0.13/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 883.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  This is a Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.35  Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.13/0.35  sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.39  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.39  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses in intial UL: 6
% 0.20/0.39  number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 66
% 0.20/0.39  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.20/0.39  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.39  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.20/0.39     distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.20/0.39     distinct function count: 2
% 0.20/0.39     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.39  
% 0.20/0.39  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.21/2.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.21/2.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 3 [ 27 1 490 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 4 [ 33 1 10880 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 5 [ 57 6 79569 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 6 [ 73 3 30140 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 7 [ 42 1 2704 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 8 [ 87 1 8362 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 9 [ 27 7 55109 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 10 [ 17 1 1795 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 11 [ 68 25 174728 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 12 [ 98 1 1265 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 13 [ 1 35 228105 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   2.07 sec ----> 620 [binary,619.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Length of proof is 7.  Level of proof is 5.
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.21/2.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.21/2.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  1 [] {+} -between(A,B,A)|equalish(A,B).
% 2.21/2.44  2 [] {+} -equidistant(A,B,C,C)|equalish(A,B).
% 2.21/2.44  3 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,C,E)|between(A,outer_pasch(B,A,D,E,C),D).
% 2.21/2.44  4 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,C,E)|between(E,B,outer_pasch(B,A,D,E,C)).
% 2.21/2.44  5 [] {+} -equalish(A,B)| -between(C,D,A)|between(C,D,B).
% 2.21/2.44  6 [] {+} -between(c,b,a).
% 2.21/2.44  7 [] {+} between(A,B,extension(A,B,C,D)).
% 2.21/2.44  8 [] {+} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,C,D),C,D).
% 2.21/2.44  9 [] {+} between(a,b,c).
% 2.21/2.44  23,22 [hyper,8,2,flip.1] {+} equalish(extension(A,B,C,C),B).
% 2.21/2.44  34 [hyper,22,5,7] {+} between(A,B,B).
% 2.21/2.44  37 [para_into,22.1.1,1.2.1,demod,23,23] {+} equalish(A,B)| -between(B,A,B).
% 2.21/2.44  58 [hyper,34,4,9] {-} between(c,b,outer_pasch(b,A,a,c,b)).
% 2.21/2.44  64 [hyper,34,3,9] {-} between(A,outer_pasch(b,A,a,c,b),a).
% 2.21/2.44  559 [hyper,64,37] {+} equalish(outer_pasch(b,a,a,c,b),a).
% 2.21/2.44  619 [hyper,559,5,58] {-} between(c,b,a).
% 2.21/2.44  620 [binary,619.1,6.1] {-} $F.
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.21/2.44  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  ============ end of search ============
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  true clauses given          10      (22.2%)
% 2.21/2.44  false clauses given         35
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.21/2.44     9  0         8
% 2.21/2.44    12  25        17
% 2.21/2.44    13  93        27
% 2.21/2.44    14  69        13
% 2.21/2.44    16  40        0
% 2.21/2.44    17  42        17
% 2.21/2.44    18  11        13
% 2.21/2.44    19  8         4
% 2.21/2.44    20  0         3
% 2.21/2.44    21  17        11
% 2.21/2.44    22  18        9
% 2.21/2.44    23  5         1
% 2.21/2.44    24  4         2
% 2.21/2.44    25  2         6
% 2.21/2.44    26  4         9
% 2.21/2.44    27  2         2
% 2.21/2.44    29  1         2
% 2.21/2.44    30  1         1
% 2.21/2.44    31  3         1
% 2.21/2.44    32  2         1
% 2.21/2.44    33  0         8
% 2.21/2.44    34  0         13
% 2.21/2.44    35  2         1
% 2.21/2.44    36  0         1
% 2.21/2.44    37  1         5
% 2.21/2.44    38  0         1
% 2.21/2.44    39  1         0
% 2.21/2.44    40  1         0
% 2.21/2.44    41  1         2
% 2.21/2.44    42  1         3
% 2.21/2.44    43  4         0
% 2.21/2.44    44  2         1
% 2.21/2.44    45  0         1
% 2.21/2.44    47  1         0
% 2.21/2.44    48  1         0
% 2.21/2.44    49  1         0
% 2.21/2.44    50  0         1
% 2.21/2.44    51  1         4
% 2.21/2.44    52  1         0
% 2.21/2.44    53  2         2
% 2.21/2.44    59  2         3
% 2.21/2.44    60  1         0
% 2.21/2.44  tot:  370       193      (34.3% true)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Model 13 [ 1 35 228105 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.21/2.44  
% 2.21/2.44  Process 883 finished Fri Jun 17 21:34:18 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------