%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : GEO001-4 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 20:19:35 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.04s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP717/GEO/GEO001-4+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 13] [nf = 0] [nu = 2] [ut = 5]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 70] [nf = 7] [nu = 15] [ut = 7]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 274] [nf = 50] [nu = 54] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1152] [nf = 153] [nu = 187] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4222] [nf = 494] [nu = 505] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 14827] [nf = 1508] [nu = 1525] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 45106] [nf = 4130] [nu = 3842] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 132051] [nf = 11915] [nu = 9312] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 350889] [nf = 29759] [nu = 22022] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 3 secs [nr = 896308] [nf = 72375] [nu = 49079] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 8 secs [nr = 2194984] [nf = 171225] [nu = 108074] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 19 secs [nr = 5104769] [nf = 383582] [nu = 230066] [ut = 9]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 8282667] [nf = 640539] [nu = 386085] [ut = 10]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 8282754] [nf = 640546] [nu = 386114] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 8283147] [nf = 640625] [nu = 386247] [ut = 19]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 31 secs [nr = 8291493] [nf = 640921] [nu = 389288] [ut = 22]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 32 secs [nr = 8334029] [nf = 648223] [nu = 399185] [ut = 24]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 33 secs [nr = 8844333] [nf = 682973] [nu = 537628] [ut = 24]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 44 secs [nr = 11413536] [nf = 1065963] [nu = 994055] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 134 secs [nr = 34104396] [nf = 3152137] [nu = 5734309] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 82011542
% 	resolvents: 74302011	factors: 7709531
% Number of unit clauses generated: 12404610
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 15.13
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4		[1] = 2		[2] = 6		[3] = 7		
% [4] = 3		[5] = 2		[7] = 1		
% [9] = 1		
% Total = 26
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 12404610	[2] = 35560596	[3] = 28609028	[4] = 5437308	
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] equalish_2		(+)2	(-)9
% [1] between_3		(+)6	(-)5
% [2] equidistant_4	(+)1	(-)3
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)9	(-)17
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 26
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 101852248
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 82011542
% Number of unification failures: 310504299
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 51
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 196221529
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 90060260
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 46
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 10464225
% N unit clauses dropped because t
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------