TSTP Solution File: GEO001-3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GEO001-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 06:17:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.57s 4.76s
% Output : Refutation 4.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10 % Problem : GEO001-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Sat Jun 18 07:14:46 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.32 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.32 The process was started by sandbox2 on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.32 Sat Jun 18 07:14:46 2022
% 0.15/0.32 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 12692.
% 0.15/0.32
% 0.15/0.32 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.32 set(auto).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.32 clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.32
% 0.15/0.32 list(usable).
% 0.15/0.32
% 0.15/0.32 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=8.
% 0.15/0.32
% 0.15/0.32 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.15/0.32 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.15/0.32 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.15/0.32 clauses in usable.
% 0.15/0.32
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.32 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.32
% 0.15/0.32 ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.32
% 0.15/0.32 ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.32 Following clause subsumed by 55 during input processing: 0 [demod,58] {-} between(A,B,extension(A,B,A,B)).
% 0.15/0.32 Following clause subsumed by 56 during input processing: 0 [demod,58] {-} equidistant(A,extension(B,A,B,A),B,A).
% 0.15/0.32 Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.32 54 back subsumes 51.
% 0.15/0.32 59 back subsumes 49.
% 0.15/0.32 59 back subsumes 36.
% 0.15/0.32 Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [copy,64,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.32 64 back subsumes 50.
% 0.15/0.32 65 back subsumes 37.
% 0.15/0.32 72 back subsumes 41.
% 0.15/0.32 72 back subsumes 40.
% 0.15/0.32
% 0.15/0.32 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.67/0.91 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.67/0.91 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.67/0.91 number of clauses in intial UL: 41
% 0.67/0.91 number of clauses initially in problem: 58
% 0.67/0.91 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 70
% 0.67/0.91 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 93
% 0.67/0.91 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.67/0.91 absolute distinct symbol count: 15
% 0.67/0.91 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.67/0.91 distinct function count: 6
% 0.67/0.91 distinct constant count: 6
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.67/0.91
% 0.67/0.91 =========== start of search ===========
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 -------- PROOF --------
% 4.57/4.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.57/4.76 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Model 3 [ 1 25 109888 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Model 4 [ 1 26 117758 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Model 5 [ 49 26 111185 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Model 6 [ 39 21 97896 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Model 7 [ 45 26 123559 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 4.41 sec ----> 2168 [binary,2167.1,35.1] {+} $F.
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Length of proof is 6. Level of proof is 4.
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 4.57/4.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.57/4.76 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 4 [] {+} -between(A,B,A)|A=B.
% 4.57/4.76 5 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,E,C)|between(B,inner_pasch(A,B,C,E,D),D).
% 4.57/4.76 6 [] {+} -between(A,B,C)| -between(D,E,C)|between(E,inner_pasch(A,B,C,E,D),A).
% 4.57/4.76 35 [] {+} -between(c,b,a).
% 4.57/4.76 60 [] {-} A=extension(B,A,C,C).
% 4.57/4.76 62,61 [copy,60,flip.1] {+} extension(A,B,C,C)=B.
% 4.57/4.76 72 [] {+} between(A,B,B).
% 4.57/4.76 73 [] {-} between(a,b,c).
% 4.57/4.76 143 [para_into,61.1.1,4.2.1,demod,62,62] {+} A=B| -between(B,A,B).
% 4.57/4.76 363 [hyper,72,6,73] {-} between(c,inner_pasch(a,b,c,c,A),a).
% 4.57/4.76 368 [hyper,72,5,73] {-} between(b,inner_pasch(a,b,c,c,A),A).
% 4.57/4.76 1553 [hyper,368,143] {-} inner_pasch(a,b,c,c,b)=b.
% 4.57/4.76 2167 [para_from,1553.1.1,363.1.2] {-} between(c,b,a).
% 4.57/4.76 2168 [binary,2167.1,35.1] {+} $F.
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.57/4.76 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 ============ end of search ============
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 true clauses given 8 (23.5%)
% 4.57/4.76 false clauses given 26
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 FALSE TRUE
% 4.57/4.76 7 0 18
% 4.57/4.76 8 0 31
% 4.57/4.76 9 10 13
% 4.57/4.76 10 7 1
% 4.57/4.76 11 43 1
% 4.57/4.76 12 64 10
% 4.57/4.76 13 66 17
% 4.57/4.76 14 39 12
% 4.57/4.76 15 28 40
% 4.57/4.76 16 26 25
% 4.57/4.76 17 14 37
% 4.57/4.76 18 13 21
% 4.57/4.76 19 20 51
% 4.57/4.76 20 24 83
% 4.57/4.76 21 36 62
% 4.57/4.76 22 45 46
% 4.57/4.76 23 16 45
% 4.57/4.76 24 56 46
% 4.57/4.76 25 92 55
% 4.57/4.76 26 81 19
% 4.57/4.76 27 47 22
% 4.57/4.76 28 12 23
% 4.57/4.76 29 12 11
% 4.57/4.76 30 38 13
% 4.57/4.76 31 63 17
% 4.57/4.76 32 21 7
% 4.57/4.76 33 4 26
% 4.57/4.76 34 9 4
% 4.57/4.76 35 28 6
% 4.57/4.76 36 32 4
% 4.57/4.76 37 12 42
% 4.57/4.76 38 2 4
% 4.57/4.76 39 1 6
% 4.57/4.76 40 16 1
% 4.57/4.76 41 27 4
% 4.57/4.76 42 31 8
% 4.57/4.76 43 1 2
% 4.57/4.76 44 2 4
% 4.57/4.76 45 4 4
% 4.57/4.76 46 4 1
% 4.57/4.76 47 7 0
% 4.57/4.76 48 0 5
% 4.57/4.76 49 2 2
% 4.57/4.76 50 6 0
% 4.57/4.76 51 1 1
% 4.57/4.76 52 14 5
% 4.57/4.76 55 0 1
% 4.57/4.76 56 2 0
% 4.57/4.76 59 3 0
% 4.57/4.76 tot: 1081 856 (44.2% true)
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Model 7 [ 45 -29 123559 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 4.57/4.76
% 4.57/4.76 Process 12692 finished Sat Jun 18 07:14:51 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------