TSTP Solution File: GEG025_1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : GEG025_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:49 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 18.27s 6.03s
% Output : CNFRefutation 18.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 20
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 47 ( 22 unt; 19 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 56 ( 30 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 24 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 41 ( 13 ~; 5 |; 22 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number arithmetic : 84 ( 25 atm; 10 fun; 49 num; 0 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 ari)
% Number of type conns : 3 ( 2 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 42 ( 18 usr; 39 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 (; 23 !; 1 ?; 24 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ d > #nlpp > inh > saarbruecken > munich > kiel > hamburg > frankfurt > cologne > berlin
%Foreground sorts:
tff(city,type,
city: $tType ).
%Background operators:
tff('#skE_7',type,
'#skE_7': $int ).
tff('#skE_2',type,
'#skE_2': $int ).
tff('#skE_1',type,
'#skE_1': $int ).
tff('#skE_6',type,
'#skE_6': $int ).
tff('#skE_5',type,
'#skE_5': $int ).
tff('#skE_8',type,
'#skE_8': $int ).
tff('#skE_4',type,
'#skE_4': $int ).
tff('#skE_3',type,
'#skE_3': $int ).
tff('#skE_9',type,
'#skE_9': $int ).
%Foreground operators:
tff(munich,type,
munich: city ).
tff(kiel,type,
kiel: city ).
tff(d,type,
d: ( city * city ) > $int ).
tff(frankfurt,type,
frankfurt: city ).
tff(berlin,type,
berlin: city ).
tff(cologne,type,
cologne: city ).
tff(saarbruecken,type,
saarbruecken: city ).
tff(hamburg,type,
hamburg: city ).
tff(inh,type,
inh: city > $int ).
tff(f_80,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X: city,Y: city] : ( d(X,Y) = d(Y,X) )
& ! [X: city,Y: city,Z: city] : $lesseq(d(X,Z),$sum(d(X,Y),d(Y,Z)))
& ! [X: city] : ( d(X,X) = 0 )
& ( d(berlin,munich) = 510 )
& ( d(berlin,cologne) = 480 )
& ( d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420 )
& ( d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160 )
& ( d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190 )
& ( d(hamburg,cologne) = 360 )
& ( d(hamburg,frankfurt) = 390 )
& ( d(cologne,frankfurt) = 150 )
& ( d(hamburg,kiel) = 90 )
& ( d(hamburg,berlin) = 250 )
& ( d(munich,frankfurt) = 300 )
& ( d(munich,saarbruecken) = 360 )
& ( inh(berlin) = 3442675 )
& ( inh(hamburg) = 1774224 )
& ( inh(munich) = 1330440 )
& ( inh(cologne) = 998105 )
& ( inh(frankfurt) = 671927 )
& ( inh(saarbruecken) = 175810 )
& ( inh(kiel) = 238281 ) )
=> ? [X: city] :
( $lesseq(d(saarbruecken,X),600)
& $lesseq(3000000,inh(X)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',exists_big_city_distance_2) ).
tff(c_64,plain,
inh(berlin) = 3442675,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_80]) ).
tff(c_56,plain,
d(saarbruecken,cologne) = 190,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_80]) ).
tff(c_49,plain,
! [Y_2: city,X_1: city] : ( d(Y_2,X_1) = d(X_1,Y_2) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_80]) ).
tff(c_150,plain,
d(cologne,saarbruecken) = 190,
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_56,c_49]) ).
tff(c_53,plain,
d(berlin,cologne) = 480,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_80]) ).
tff(c_45,plain,
! [X_3: city,Z_5: city,Y_4: city] : $lesseq(d(X_3,Z_5),$sum(d(X_3,Y_4),d(Y_4,Z_5))),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_80]) ).
tff(c_296,plain,
! [X_11: city,Y_12: city,Z_13: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X_11,Y_12),d(Y_12,Z_13)),d(X_11,Z_13)),
inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_45]) ).
tff(c_4740,plain,
! [Z_322: city] : ~ $less($sum(480,d(cologne,Z_322)),d(berlin,Z_322)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_53,c_296]) ).
tff(c_4809,plain,
~ $less($sum(480,190),d(berlin,saarbruecken)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_150,c_4740]) ).
tff(c_4811,plain,
~ $less(670,d(berlin,saarbruecken)),
inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_4809]) ).
tff(c_6485,plain,
d(berlin,saarbruecken) = '#skE_7',
inference(define,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4811]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
! [X_7: city] :
( ~ $lesseq(3000000,inh(X_7))
| ~ $lesseq(d(saarbruecken,X_7),600) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_80]) ).
tff(c_1263,plain,
! [X_27: city] :
( $less(inh(X_27),3000000)
| $less(600,d(saarbruecken,X_27)) ),
inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_2]) ).
tff(c_13735,plain,
! [X_1260: city] :
( $less(inh(X_1260),3000000)
| $less(600,d(X_1260,saarbruecken)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_49,c_1263]) ).
tff(c_13744,plain,
( $less(inh(berlin),3000000)
| $less(600,'#skE_7') ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6485,c_13735]) ).
tff(c_13772,plain,
( $less(3442675,3000000)
| $less(600,'#skE_7') ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_64,c_13744]) ).
tff(c_13774,plain,
$less(600,'#skE_7'),
inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_13772]) ).
tff(c_54,plain,
d(berlin,frankfurt) = 420,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_80]) ).
tff(c_55,plain,
d(saarbruecken,frankfurt) = 160,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_80]) ).
tff(c_198,plain,
d(frankfurt,saarbruecken) = 160,
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_49,c_55]) ).
tff(c_50,plain,
! [X_3: city,Y_4: city,Z_5: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(X_3,Y_4),d(Y_4,Z_5)),d(X_3,Z_5)),
inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LRFIA')],[c_45]) ).
tff(c_6758,plain,
! [Y_4: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(berlin,Y_4),d(Y_4,saarbruecken)),'#skE_7'),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6485,c_50]) ).
tff(c_7725,plain,
! [Y_724: city] : ~ $less($sum(d(Y_724,saarbruecken),d(berlin,Y_724)),'#skE_7'),
inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_6758]) ).
tff(c_7743,plain,
~ $less($sum(160,d(berlin,frankfurt)),'#skE_7'),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_198,c_7725]) ).
tff(c_7800,plain,
~ $less($sum(160,420),'#skE_7'),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_54,c_7743]) ).
tff(c_7802,plain,
~ $less(580,'#skE_7'),
inference(backgroundSimplification,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_7800]) ).
tff(c_13787,plain,
$false,
inference(close,[status(thm),theory('LIA')],[c_13774,c_7802]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : GEG025_1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 19:51:58 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 18.27/6.03 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 18.27/6.03
% 18.27/6.03 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 18.27/6.06
% 18.27/6.06 Inference rules
% 18.27/6.06 ----------------------
% 18.27/6.06 #Ref : 0
% 18.27/6.06 #Sup : 2059
% 18.27/6.06 #Fact : 0
% 18.27/6.06 #Define : 9
% 18.27/6.06 #Split : 0
% 18.27/6.06 #Chain : 0
% 18.27/6.06 #Close : 1
% 18.27/6.06
% 18.27/6.06 Ordering : LPO
% 18.27/6.06
% 18.27/6.06 Simplification rules
% 18.27/6.06 ----------------------
% 18.27/6.06 #Subsume : 300
% 18.27/6.06 #Demod : 1620
% 18.27/6.06 #Tautology : 598
% 18.27/6.06 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 18.27/6.06 #BackRed : 0
% 18.27/6.06
% 18.27/6.06 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 18.27/6.06 #Strategies tried : 1
% 18.27/6.06
% 18.27/6.06 Timing (in seconds)
% 18.27/6.06 ----------------------
% 18.27/6.10 Preprocessing : 0.51
% 18.27/6.10 Parsing : 0.29
% 18.27/6.10 CNF conversion : 0.03
% 18.27/6.10 Main loop : 4.54
% 18.27/6.10 Inferencing : 0.41
% 18.27/6.10 Reduction : 0.65
% 18.27/6.10 Demodulation : 0.52
% 18.27/6.10 BG Simplification : 0.12
% 18.27/6.10 Subsumption : 0.50
% 18.27/6.10 Abstraction : 0.07
% 18.27/6.10 MUC search : 0.03
% 18.27/6.10 Cooper : 2.67
% 18.27/6.10 Total : 5.09
% 18.27/6.10 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 18.27/6.10 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 18.27/6.10 Index Matching : 0.00
% 18.27/6.10 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------