TSTP Solution File: FLD071-2 by CSE_E---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem : FLD071-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:27:51 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 22
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 40 ( 14 unt; 12 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 52 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 48 ( 24 ~; 24 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 11 ( 7 >; 4 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 0 sgn; 0 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
add: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_23,type,
equalish: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
defined: $i > $o ).
tff(decl_25,type,
additive_identity: $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
additive_inverse: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
multiplicative_identity: $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
multiplicative_inverse: $i > $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
less_or_equal: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_31,type,
a: $i ).
tff(decl_32,type,
b: $i ).
tff(decl_33,type,
u: $i ).
cnf(symmetry_of_equality,axiom,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ equalish(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',symmetry_of_equality) ).
cnf(multiply_equals_u_6,negated_conjecture,
equalish(multiply(a,b),u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply_equals_u_6) ).
cnf(compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation,axiom,
( less_or_equal(X1,X2)
| ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
| ~ equalish(X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation) ).
cnf(totality_of_order_relation,axiom,
( less_or_equal(X1,X2)
| less_or_equal(X2,X1)
| ~ defined(X1)
| ~ defined(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',totality_of_order_relation) ).
cnf(u_is_defined,hypothesis,
defined(u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',u_is_defined) ).
cnf(compatibility_of_order_relation_and_multiplication,axiom,
( less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(X1,X2))
| ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1)
| ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',compatibility_of_order_relation_and_multiplication) ).
cnf(less_or_equal_5,negated_conjecture,
less_or_equal(additive_identity,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_5) ).
cnf(transitivity_of_order_relation,axiom,
( less_or_equal(X1,X2)
| ~ less_or_equal(X1,X3)
| ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/FLD001-0.ax',transitivity_of_order_relation) ).
cnf(less_or_equal_4,negated_conjecture,
less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_4) ).
cnf(not_less_or_equal_7,negated_conjecture,
~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_less_or_equal_7) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
( equalish(X1,X2)
| ~ equalish(X2,X1) ),
symmetry_of_equality ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
equalish(multiply(a,b),u),
multiply_equals_u_6 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
( less_or_equal(X1,X2)
| ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2)
| ~ equalish(X3,X1) ),
compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
equalish(u,multiply(a,b)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( less_or_equal(X1,X2)
| less_or_equal(X2,X1)
| ~ defined(X1)
| ~ defined(X2) ),
totality_of_order_relation ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( less_or_equal(multiply(a,b),X1)
| ~ less_or_equal(u,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( less_or_equal(X1,X1)
| ~ defined(X1) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
defined(u),
u_is_defined ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
( less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(X1,X2))
| ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1)
| ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X2) ),
compatibility_of_order_relation_and_multiplication ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
less_or_equal(additive_identity,b),
less_or_equal_5 ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
( less_or_equal(X1,X2)
| ~ less_or_equal(X1,X3)
| ~ less_or_equal(X3,X2) ),
transitivity_of_order_relation ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
less_or_equal(multiply(a,b),u),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(X1,b))
| ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
less_or_equal_4 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
( less_or_equal(X1,u)
| ~ less_or_equal(X1,multiply(a,b)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(a,b)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,u),
not_less_or_equal_7 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : FLD071-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:01:41 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.56 start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.57 % Version : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.57 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.57 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.57 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.57 % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.58 % Total time : 0.009000 s
% 0.19/0.58 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.58 % Total time : 0.012000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------