TSTP Solution File: FLD071-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : FLD071-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:42 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.13s 1.91s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   7 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   13 (   8   ~;   5   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   7   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (;   4   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ less_or_equal > equalish > defined > multiply > add > #nlpp > multiplicative_inverse > additive_inverse > multiplicative_identity > b > additive_identity > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(less_or_equal,type,
    less_or_equal: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(additive_identity,type,
    additive_identity: $i ).

tff(multiplicative_identity,type,
    multiplicative_identity: $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(additive_inverse,type,
    additive_inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(defined,type,
    defined: $i > $o ).

tff(multiplicative_inverse,type,
    multiplicative_inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(add,type,
    add: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(equalish,type,
    equalish: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_238,axiom,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_239,axiom,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,b),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_189,axiom,
    ! [Y,Z] :
      ( less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(Y,Z))
      | ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,Y)
      | ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,Z) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_241,axiom,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(a,b)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_60,plain,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_238]) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    less_or_equal(additive_identity,b),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_239]) ).

tff(c_351,plain,
    ! [Z_90,Y_91] :
      ( ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,Z_90)
      | ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,Y_91)
      | less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(Y_91,Z_90)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_189]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(a,b)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_241]) ).

tff(c_360,plain,
    ( ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,b)
    | ~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,a) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_351,c_64]) ).

tff(c_368,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_60,c_62,c_360]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : FLD071-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 19:50:36 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.13/1.91  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.13/1.92  
% 4.13/1.92  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.13/1.94  
% 4.13/1.94  Inference rules
% 4.13/1.94  ----------------------
% 4.13/1.94  #Ref     : 0
% 4.13/1.94  #Sup     : 68
% 4.13/1.94  #Fact    : 2
% 4.13/1.94  #Define  : 0
% 4.13/1.94  #Split   : 2
% 4.13/1.94  #Chain   : 0
% 4.13/1.94  #Close   : 0
% 4.13/1.94  
% 4.13/1.94  Ordering : KBO
% 4.13/1.94  
% 4.13/1.94  Simplification rules
% 4.13/1.94  ----------------------
% 4.13/1.94  #Subsume      : 19
% 4.13/1.94  #Demod        : 23
% 4.13/1.94  #Tautology    : 10
% 4.13/1.94  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 4.13/1.94  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.13/1.94  
% 4.13/1.94  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.13/1.94  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.13/1.94  
% 4.13/1.94  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.13/1.94  ----------------------
% 4.13/1.95  Preprocessing        : 0.51
% 4.13/1.95  Parsing              : 0.28
% 4.13/1.95  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 4.13/1.95  Main loop            : 0.40
% 4.13/1.95  Inferencing          : 0.16
% 4.13/1.95  Reduction            : 0.09
% 4.13/1.95  Demodulation         : 0.07
% 4.13/1.95  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 4.13/1.95  Subsumption          : 0.10
% 4.13/1.95  Abstraction          : 0.01
% 4.13/1.95  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.13/1.95  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.13/1.95  Total                : 0.95
% 4.13/1.95  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.13/1.95  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.13/1.95  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.13/1.95  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------