TSTP Solution File: FLD070-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : FLD070-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:28:38 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.61s 0.83s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : FLD070-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 00:55:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.61/0.83  
% 0.61/0.83  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.61/0.83  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.61/0.83  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.61/0.83  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.61/0.83  SPASS derived 1608 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 931 clauses.
% 0.61/0.83  SPASS allocated 77265 KBytes.
% 0.61/0.83  SPASS spent	0:00:00.46 on the problem.
% 0.61/0.83  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.61/0.83  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.61/0.83  		0:00:00.03 for inferences.
% 0.61/0.83  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.61/0.83  		0:00:00.36 for the reduction.
% 0.61/0.83  
% 0.61/0.83  
% 0.61/0.83  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 32 :
% 0.61/0.83  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.61/0.83  1[0:Inp] ||  -> defined(a)*.
% 0.61/0.83  2[0:Inp] ||  -> defined(b)*.
% 0.61/0.83  3[0:Inp] ||  -> less_or_equal(additive_identity,a)*r.
% 0.61/0.83  4[0:Inp] ||  -> less_or_equal(additive_identity,b)*r.
% 0.61/0.83  5[0:Inp] || less_or_equal(additive_identity,add(a,b))*r -> .
% 0.61/0.83  7[0:Inp] defined(u) ||  -> equalish(add(additive_identity,u),u)*l.
% 0.61/0.83  15[0:Inp] defined(u) defined(v) ||  -> defined(add(v,u))*.
% 0.61/0.83  16[0:Inp] ||  -> defined(additive_identity)*.
% 0.61/0.83  21[0:Inp] || less_or_equal(u,v)*+ less_or_equal(v,u)* -> equalish(v,u).
% 0.61/0.83  22[0:Inp] || less_or_equal(u,v)* less_or_equal(v,w)* -> less_or_equal(u,w)*.
% 0.61/0.83  23[0:Inp] defined(u) defined(v) ||  -> less_or_equal(u,v)* less_or_equal(v,u)*.
% 0.61/0.83  24[0:Inp] defined(u) || less_or_equal(v,w) -> less_or_equal(add(v,u),add(w,u))*.
% 0.61/0.83  28[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)* equalish(v,w)* -> equalish(u,w)*.
% 0.61/0.83  31[0:Inp] || equalish(u,v)*+ less_or_equal(u,w)* -> less_or_equal(v,w)*.
% 0.61/0.83  37[0:Res:4.0,21.1] || less_or_equal(b,additive_identity)*l -> equalish(b,additive_identity).
% 0.61/0.83  44[0:Res:3.0,24.1] defined(u) ||  -> less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,u),add(a,u))*r.
% 0.61/0.83  45[0:Res:23.2,5.0] defined(additive_identity) defined(add(a,b)) ||  -> less_or_equal(add(a,b),additive_identity)*l.
% 0.61/0.83  46[0:Res:31.2,5.0] || equalish(u,additive_identity)* less_or_equal(u,add(a,b))*+ -> .
% 0.61/0.83  48[0:MRR:45.0,16.0] defined(add(a,b)) ||  -> less_or_equal(add(a,b),additive_identity)*l.
% 0.61/0.83  65[0:SoR:48.0,15.2] defined(a) defined(b) ||  -> less_or_equal(add(a,b),additive_identity)*l.
% 0.61/0.83  66[0:SSi:65.1,65.0,2.0,1.0] ||  -> less_or_equal(add(a,b),additive_identity)*l.
% 0.61/0.83  67[0:OCh:22.1,22.0,44.1,66.0] defined(b) ||  -> less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,b),additive_identity)*l.
% 0.61/0.83  69[0:SSi:67.0,2.0] ||  -> less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,b),additive_identity)*l.
% 0.61/0.83  643[0:Res:7.1,31.0] defined(u) || less_or_equal(add(additive_identity,u),v)* -> less_or_equal(u,v).
% 0.61/0.83  1280[0:Res:44.1,46.1] defined(b) || equalish(add(additive_identity,b),additive_identity)*l -> .
% 0.61/0.83  1300[0:SSi:1280.0,2.0] || equalish(add(additive_identity,b),additive_identity)*l -> .
% 0.61/0.83  1309[0:NCh:28.2,28.0,1300.0,7.1] defined(b) || equalish(b,additive_identity)*l -> .
% 0.61/0.83  1311[0:SSi:1309.0,2.0] || equalish(b,additive_identity)*l -> .
% 0.61/0.83  1312[0:MRR:37.1,1311.0] || less_or_equal(b,additive_identity)*l -> .
% 0.61/0.83  1979[0:Res:69.0,643.1] defined(b) ||  -> less_or_equal(b,additive_identity)*l.
% 0.61/0.83  2036[0:SSi:1979.0,2.0] ||  -> less_or_equal(b,additive_identity)*l.
% 0.61/0.83  2037[0:MRR:2036.0,1312.0] ||  -> .
% 0.61/0.83  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.61/0.83  Formulae used in the proof : a_is_defined b_is_defined less_or_equal_3 less_or_equal_4 not_less_or_equal_5 existence_of_identity_addition well_definedness_of_addition well_definedness_of_additive_identity antisymmetry_of_order_relation transitivity_of_order_relation totality_of_order_relation compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition transitivity_of_equality compatibility_of_equality_and_order_relation
% 0.61/0.83  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------