TSTP Solution File: FLD067-4 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : FLD067-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:07:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.55s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 25 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 19 ( 10 ~; 9 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 13 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f110,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f106,f32]) ).
fof(f32,axiom,
~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_less_or_equal_6) ).
fof(f106,plain,
less_or_equal(additive_identity,u),
inference(resolution,[],[f97,f43]) ).
fof(f43,plain,
sum(a,sF0,additive_identity),
inference(resolution,[],[f38,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X5] :
( ~ sum(X0,X3,X5)
| sum(X3,X0,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_addition) ).
fof(f38,plain,
sum(sF0,a,additive_identity),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f37,f27]) ).
fof(f27,axiom,
defined(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).
fof(f37,plain,
( sum(sF0,a,additive_identity)
| ~ defined(a) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f4,f33]) ).
fof(f33,plain,
additive_inverse(a) = sF0,
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] :
( sum(additive_inverse(X0),X0,additive_identity)
| ~ defined(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).
fof(f97,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ sum(a,sF0,X0)
| less_or_equal(X0,u) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f82,f34]) ).
fof(f34,plain,
sum(b,sF0,u),
inference(definition_folding,[],[f31,f33]) ).
fof(f31,axiom,
sum(b,additive_inverse(a),u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_5) ).
fof(f82,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ sum(b,X0,X1)
| ~ sum(a,X0,X2)
| less_or_equal(X2,X1) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f24,f30]) ).
fof(f30,axiom,
less_or_equal(a,b),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_4) ).
fof(f24,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( ~ less_or_equal(X0,X3)
| ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
| ~ sum(X0,X5,X4)
| less_or_equal(X4,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : FLD067-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 20:46:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.53 % (7051)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (7034)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (7043)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.20/0.54 % (7035)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.20/0.54 % (7035)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.54 % (7035)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 % (7035)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.54 TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.54 TRYING [2]
% 0.20/0.55 TRYING [3]
% 0.20/0.55 % (7043)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.55 % (7042)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.20/0.55 % (7050)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.20/0.55 % (7035)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.55 % (7035)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.55 % (7035)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.20/0.55
% 0.20/0.55 % (7035)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.20/0.55 % (7035)Time elapsed: 0.126 s
% 0.20/0.55 % (7035)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.20/0.55 % (7035)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55 % (7035)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55 % (7051)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.55 % (7043)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.55 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.55 % (7043)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55 % (7043)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.55 % (7043)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.55 % (7043)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.55
% 0.20/0.55 % (7043)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.20/0.55 % (7043)Time elapsed: 0.128 s
% 0.20/0.55 % (7043)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 0.20/0.55 % (7043)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55 % (7043)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.55 % (7027)Success in time 0.2 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------