TSTP Solution File: FLD067-2 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : FLD067-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 19:20:07 EST 2010

% Result   : Timeout 300.06s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP24657/FLD/FLD067-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 268] [nf = 0] [nu = 176] [ut = 111]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 1079629] [nf = 172] [nu = 802885] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 123 secs [nr = 227995223] [nf = 400] [nu = 227657648] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 124 secs [nr = 229456776] [nf = 572] [nu = 228842549] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 566436677
% 	resolvents: 566435937	factors: 740
% Number of unit clauses generated: 565751554
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 99.88
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 9		[1] = 102	[2] = 31889	
% Total = 32000
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 565751554	[2] = 684306	[3] = 817	
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] defined_1		(+)14485	(-)0
% [1] equalish_2		(+)17244	(-)2
% [2] less_or_equal_2	(+)251	(-)18
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)31980	(-)20
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 32000
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 549214
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 566436677
% Number of unification failures: 1061866
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 39006
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 281944
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 157426
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 36
% Max entries in substitution set: 6
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 133884
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 112876
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 565018069
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 16
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 5
% Number of states in UCFA table: 125625
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 368185
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 144000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.87
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.34
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 46
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 567498543
% ConstructUnitClause() = 165875
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.20 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 1888122
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------