TSTP Solution File: FLD064-3 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : FLD064-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:37:09 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.51s
% Output   : Proof 1.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : FLD064-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:08:10 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.51  Command-line arguments: --kbo-weight0 --lhs-weight 5 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10 --goal-heuristic
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.51  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.21/0.51    fof(a_is_defined, hypothesis, defined(a)).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(commutativity_addition, axiom, ![X, Y, Z]: (sum(Y, X, Z) | ~sum(X, Y, Z))).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition, axiom, ![V, U, X2, Y2, Z2]: (less_or_equal(U, V) | (~less_or_equal(X2, Y2) | (~sum(X2, Z2, U) | ~sum(Y2, Z2, V))))).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(existence_of_identity_addition, axiom, ![X2]: (sum(additive_identity, X2, X2) | ~defined(X2))).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(existence_of_inverse_addition, axiom, ![X2]: (sum(additive_inverse(X2), X2, additive_identity) | ~defined(X2))).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(less_or_equal_2, negated_conjecture, less_or_equal(additive_identity, a)).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(not_less_or_equal_3, negated_conjecture, ~less_or_equal(additive_inverse(a), additive_identity)).
% 0.21/0.51    fof(well_definedness_of_additive_inverse, axiom, ![X2]: (defined(additive_inverse(X2)) | ~defined(X2))).
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.21/0.51  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.21/0.51  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.21/0.51    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.21/0.51    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.21/0.51  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.21/0.51  variables of u and v.
% 0.21/0.51  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.21/0.51  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.21/0.51  
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 1 (a_is_defined): defined(a) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 2 (less_or_equal_2): less_or_equal(additive_identity, a) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 3 (existence_of_identity_addition): fresh14(X, X, Y) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 4 (existence_of_inverse_addition): fresh12(X, X, Y) = true.
% 0.21/0.51  Axiom 5 (well_definedness_of_additive_inverse): fresh3(X, X, Y) = true.
% 0.21/0.52  Axiom 6 (compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition): fresh28(X, X, Y, Z) = true.
% 0.21/0.52  Axiom 7 (existence_of_identity_addition): fresh14(defined(X), true, X) = sum(additive_identity, X, X).
% 0.21/0.52  Axiom 8 (existence_of_inverse_addition): fresh12(defined(X), true, X) = sum(additive_inverse(X), X, additive_identity).
% 0.21/0.52  Axiom 9 (well_definedness_of_additive_inverse): fresh3(defined(X), true, X) = defined(additive_inverse(X)).
% 0.21/0.52  Axiom 10 (commutativity_addition): fresh18(X, X, Y, Z, W) = true.
% 0.21/0.52  Axiom 11 (compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition): fresh16(X, X, Y, Z, W, V) = less_or_equal(Y, Z).
% 0.21/0.52  Axiom 12 (compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition): fresh27(X, X, Y, Z, W, V, U) = fresh28(sum(W, U, Y), true, Y, Z).
% 0.21/0.52  Axiom 13 (commutativity_addition): fresh18(sum(X, Y, Z), true, Y, X, Z) = sum(Y, X, Z).
% 0.21/0.52  Axiom 14 (compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition): fresh27(less_or_equal(X, Y), true, Z, W, X, Y, V) = fresh16(sum(Y, V, W), true, Z, W, X, V).
% 0.21/0.52  
% 0.21/0.52  Goal 1 (not_less_or_equal_3): less_or_equal(additive_inverse(a), additive_identity) = true.
% 0.21/0.52  Proof:
% 0.21/0.52    less_or_equal(additive_inverse(a), additive_identity)
% 0.21/0.52  = { by axiom 11 (compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) R->L }
% 0.21/0.52    fresh16(true, true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity, additive_identity, additive_inverse(a))
% 0.21/0.52  = { by axiom 10 (commutativity_addition) R->L }
% 0.21/0.52    fresh16(fresh18(true, true, a, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity), true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity, additive_identity, additive_inverse(a))
% 0.21/0.52  = { by axiom 4 (existence_of_inverse_addition) R->L }
% 0.21/0.52    fresh16(fresh18(fresh12(true, true, a), true, a, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity), true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity, additive_identity, additive_inverse(a))
% 0.21/0.52  = { by axiom 1 (a_is_defined) R->L }
% 0.21/0.52    fresh16(fresh18(fresh12(defined(a), true, a), true, a, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity), true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity, additive_identity, additive_inverse(a))
% 0.21/0.52  = { by axiom 8 (existence_of_inverse_addition) }
% 0.21/0.52    fresh16(fresh18(sum(additive_inverse(a), a, additive_identity), true, a, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity), true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity, additive_identity, additive_inverse(a))
% 0.21/0.52  = { by axiom 13 (commutativity_addition) }
% 0.21/0.52    fresh16(sum(a, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity), true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity, additive_identity, additive_inverse(a))
% 0.21/0.52  = { by axiom 14 (compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) R->L }
% 0.21/0.52    fresh27(less_or_equal(additive_identity, a), true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity, additive_identity, a, additive_inverse(a))
% 0.21/0.52  = { by axiom 2 (less_or_equal_2) }
% 0.21/0.52    fresh27(true, true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity, additive_identity, a, additive_inverse(a))
% 0.21/0.52  = { by axiom 12 (compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) }
% 0.21/0.52    fresh28(sum(additive_identity, additive_inverse(a), additive_inverse(a)), true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity)
% 0.21/0.52  = { by axiom 7 (existence_of_identity_addition) R->L }
% 0.21/0.52    fresh28(fresh14(defined(additive_inverse(a)), true, additive_inverse(a)), true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity)
% 1.22/0.52  = { by axiom 9 (well_definedness_of_additive_inverse) R->L }
% 1.22/0.52    fresh28(fresh14(fresh3(defined(a), true, a), true, additive_inverse(a)), true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity)
% 1.22/0.52  = { by axiom 1 (a_is_defined) }
% 1.22/0.52    fresh28(fresh14(fresh3(true, true, a), true, additive_inverse(a)), true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity)
% 1.22/0.52  = { by axiom 5 (well_definedness_of_additive_inverse) }
% 1.22/0.52    fresh28(fresh14(true, true, additive_inverse(a)), true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity)
% 1.22/0.52  = { by axiom 3 (existence_of_identity_addition) }
% 1.22/0.52    fresh28(true, true, additive_inverse(a), additive_identity)
% 1.22/0.52  = { by axiom 6 (compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) }
% 1.22/0.52    true
% 1.22/0.52  % SZS output end Proof
% 1.22/0.52  
% 1.22/0.52  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------