TSTP Solution File: FLD059-4 by Vampire-SAT---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem : FLD059-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Apr 30 11:06:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.39s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 18 ~; 17 |; 0 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 2 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f919,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f117,f910]) ).
fof(f910,plain,
spl0_5,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f909]) ).
fof(f909,plain,
( $false
| spl0_5 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f908,f27]) ).
fof(f27,axiom,
defined(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).
fof(f908,plain,
( ~ defined(a)
| spl0_5 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f902,f81]) ).
fof(f81,plain,
( ~ less_or_equal(a,u)
| spl0_5 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f80]) ).
fof(f80,plain,
( spl0_5
<=> less_or_equal(a,u) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_5])]) ).
fof(f902,plain,
( less_or_equal(a,u)
| ~ defined(a) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f234,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0] :
( sum(additive_identity,X0,X0)
| ~ defined(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_of_identity_addition) ).
fof(f234,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ sum(additive_identity,a,X0)
| less_or_equal(X0,u) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f93,f30]) ).
fof(f30,axiom,
sum(a,a,u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_4) ).
fof(f93,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ sum(a,X2,X1)
| less_or_equal(X0,X1)
| ~ sum(additive_identity,X2,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f24,f29]) ).
fof(f29,axiom,
less_or_equal(additive_identity,a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_or_equal_3) ).
fof(f24,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( ~ less_or_equal(X0,X3)
| less_or_equal(X4,X1)
| ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
| ~ sum(X0,X5,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',compatibility_of_order_relation_and_addition) ).
fof(f117,plain,
~ spl0_5,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f116]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f112,f31]) ).
fof(f31,axiom,
~ less_or_equal(additive_identity,u),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_less_or_equal_5) ).
fof(f112,plain,
( less_or_equal(additive_identity,u)
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f82,f40]) ).
fof(f40,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ less_or_equal(a,X0)
| less_or_equal(additive_identity,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f22,f29]) ).
fof(f22,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X5] :
( ~ less_or_equal(X0,X3)
| ~ less_or_equal(X3,X5)
| less_or_equal(X0,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitivity_of_order_relation) ).
fof(f82,plain,
( less_or_equal(a,u)
| ~ spl0_5 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f80]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : FLD059-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Apr 30 03:38:55 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.34 % (12739)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.20/0.36 % (12740)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.36 TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.36 TRYING [2]
% 0.20/0.36 TRYING [3]
% 0.20/0.36 % (12745)dis+11_4:5_nm=4_216 on theBenchmark for (216ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.37 % (12743)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3:gsp=on:nm=4_470 on theBenchmark for (470ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.37 % (12746)fmb+10_1_fmbas=off:fmbsr=1.3:nm=2:si=on:rtra=on:rawr=on:rp=on:fmbksg=on_1451 on theBenchmark for (1451ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.37 % (12741)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=expand:fmbksg=on:fmbsr=1.3_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.37 % (12742)dis-2_2:3_amm=sco:anc=none:bce=on:fsr=off:gsp=on:nm=16:nwc=1.2:nicw=on:sac=on:sp=weighted_frequency_476 on theBenchmark for (476ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.37 % (12744)dis+1_20_av=off:lcm=predicate:nm=2:nwc=2.0_396 on theBenchmark for (396ds/0Mi)
% 0.20/0.37 TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.37 TRYING [2]
% 0.20/0.37 TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.37 TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.37 TRYING [2]
% 0.20/0.37 TRYING [2]
% 0.20/0.37 TRYING [3]
% 0.20/0.37 TRYING [4]
% 0.20/0.37 TRYING [3]
% 0.20/0.37 TRYING [3]
% 0.20/0.39 TRYING [4]
% 0.20/0.39 TRYING [4]
% 0.20/0.39 % (12745)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.39 TRYING [4]
% 0.20/0.39 % (12745)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.39 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.39 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.39 % (12745)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.39 % (12745)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 8e9376e55 on 2024-01-18 13:49:33 +0100)
% 0.20/0.39 % (12745)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.39
% 0.20/0.39 % (12745)Memory used [KB]: 1115
% 0.20/0.39 % (12745)Time elapsed: 0.032 s
% 0.20/0.39 % (12745)Instructions burned: 43 (million)
% 0.20/0.39 % (12745)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.39 % (12745)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.39 % (12739)Success in time 0.052 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------