TSTP Solution File: FLD056-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : FLD056-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:06:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   13 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   6   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    2 (   2   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f57,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f56,f29]) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ~ less_or_equal(a,a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_less_or_equal_2) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    less_or_equal(a,a),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f55,f28]) ).

fof(f28,axiom,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

fof(f55,plain,
    ( ~ defined(a)
    | less_or_equal(a,a) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f44]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ( ~ defined(a)
    | ~ defined(a)
    | less_or_equal(a,a) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f18,f29]) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( less_or_equal(X1,X0)
      | less_or_equal(X0,X1)
      | ~ defined(X0)
      | ~ defined(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',totality_of_order_relation) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : FLD056-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 20:38:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  % (10577)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.20/0.48  % (10585)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (10585)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.49  % (10585)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  % (10585)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (10585)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.49  % (10585)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.49  % (10585)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  % (10585)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.20/0.49  % (10585)Time elapsed: 0.078 s
% 0.20/0.49  % (10585)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.20/0.49  % (10585)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (10585)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (10560)Success in time 0.145 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------