TSTP Solution File: FLD034-3 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : FLD034-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:27:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.82s 2.04s
% Output   : Refutation 1.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : FLD034-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 04:23:05 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35  The process was started by sandbox2 on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35  Tue Jun  7 04:23:05 2022
% 0.13/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 25415.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.13/0.35  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.35  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.35     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35  
% 0.13/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.44  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.44  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.44  number of clauses in intial UL: 48
% 0.20/0.44  number of clauses initially in problem: 53
% 0.20/0.44  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.20/0.44  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/0.44  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.44  absolute distinct symbol count: 12
% 0.20/0.44     distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.20/0.44     distinct function count: 4
% 0.20/0.44     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.44  
% 0.20/0.44  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.82/2.04  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.82/2.04  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 3 [ 1 2 1826 ] (0.00 seconds, 70685 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 4 [ 2 2 299 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 5 [ 2 1 876 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 6 [ 3 1 802 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 7 [ 3 1 411 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 8 [ 4 1 302 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 9 [ 7 1 144 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 10 [ 5 1 104 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 11 [ 3 2 2082 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 12 [ 3 1 271 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 13 [ 3 2 105 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 14 [ 6 2 31832 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 15 [ 3 2 327 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 16 [ 8 2 14106 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 17 [ 3 1 143 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 18 [ 7 1 454 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 19 [ 17 2 113 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 20 [ 5 1 120 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 21 [ 18 1 164 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   1.66 sec ----> 1316 [binary,1315.1,25.1] {-} $F.
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 2.
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.82/2.04  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.82/2.04  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  6 [] {+} product(A,B,C)| -product(A,D,E)| -product(D,F,B)| -product(E,F,C).
% 1.82/2.04  8 [] {+} product(multiplicative_identity,A,A)| -defined(A).
% 1.82/2.04  10 [] {+} product(A,B,C)| -product(B,A,C).
% 1.82/2.04  25 [] {+} -product(m,a,a).
% 1.82/2.04  31 [factor,6.3.4] {+} product(A,B,B)| -product(A,C,C)| -product(C,D,B).
% 1.82/2.04  51 [] {+} defined(a).
% 1.82/2.04  53 [] {+} product(multiplicative_identity,m,multiplicative_identity).
% 1.82/2.04  111 [hyper,51,8] {+} product(multiplicative_identity,a,a).
% 1.82/2.04  152 [hyper,53,10] {+} product(m,multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_identity).
% 1.82/2.04  1315 [hyper,152,31,111] {-} product(m,a,a).
% 1.82/2.04  1316 [binary,1315.1,25.1] {-} $F.
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.82/2.04  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  ============ end of search ============
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  true clauses given           6      (22.2%)
% 1.82/2.04  false clauses given         21
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04        FALSE     TRUE
% 1.82/2.04     4  33        2
% 1.82/2.04     5  81        0
% 1.82/2.04     6  202       3
% 1.82/2.04     7  143       1
% 1.82/2.04     8  209       15
% 1.82/2.04     9  13        2
% 1.82/2.04    10  170       27
% 1.82/2.04    11  7         1
% 1.82/2.04    12  139       25
% 1.82/2.04    14  141       15
% 1.82/2.04    15  7         1
% 1.82/2.04  tot:  1145      92      (7.4% true)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Model 21 [ 18 1 164 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.82/2.04  
% 1.82/2.04  Process 25415 finished Tue Jun  7 04:23:07 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------