TSTP Solution File: FLD031-5 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : FLD031-5 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 18:31:05 EST 2010
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.27s
% Output : Refutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP20837/FLD/FLD031-5+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 120] [nf = 0] [nu = 74] [ut = 46]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 57848] [nf = 76] [nu = 43189] [ut = 1624]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% +================================================+
% | |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% | |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: product_3(multiplicative_identity_0(),a_0(),multiplicative_identity_0())
% B1: ~sum_3(additive_identity_0(),a_0(),additive_identity_0())
% B2: ~product_3(multiplicative_identity_0(),multiplicative_identity_0(),multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()))
% B7: ~product_3(x1,x0,x2) | product_3(x0,x1,x2)
% B9: ~defined_1(x0) | product_3(multiplicative_identity_0(),x0,x0)
% B19: ~defined_1(x0) | defined_1(multiplicative_inverse_1(x0)) | sum_3(additive_identity_0(),x0,additive_identity_0())
% B20: ~defined_1(x0) | product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(x0),x0,multiplicative_identity_0()) | sum_3(additive_identity_0(),x0,additive_identity_0())
% B21: ~product_3(x3,x5,x2) | ~product_3(x4,x1,x5) | ~product_3(x3,x4,x0) | product_3(x0,x1,x2)
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U5: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c1 t1 td1 b > defined_1(a_0())
% U7: < d1 v0 dv0 f0 c3 t3 td1 > product_3(a_0(),multiplicative_identity_0(),multiplicative_identity_0())
% U46: < d2 v0 dv0 f1 c1 t2 td2 > defined_1(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()))
% U47: < d2 v0 dv0 f1 c3 t4 td2 > product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()),a_0(),multiplicative_identity_0())
% U1477: < d2 v0 dv0 f2 c3 t5 td2 > product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()),multiplicative_identity_0(),multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()))
% U1844: < d3 v0 dv0 f1 c3 t4 td2 > ~product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()),a_0(),multiplicative_identity_0())
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U5:
% defined_1(a_0()) ....... U5
% Derivation of unit clause U7:
% product_3(multiplicative_identity_0(),a_0(),multiplicative_identity_0()) ....... B0
% ~product_3(x1,x0,x2) | product_3(x0,x1,x2) ....... B7
% product_3(a_0(), multiplicative_identity_0(), multiplicative_identity_0()) ....... R1 [B0:L0, B7:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U46:
% ~sum_3(additive_identity_0(),a_0(),additive_identity_0()) ....... B1
% ~defined_1(x0) | defined_1(multiplicative_inverse_1(x0)) | sum_3(additive_identity_0(),x0,additive_identity_0()) ....... B19
% ~defined_1(a_0()) | defined_1(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0())) ....... R1 [B1:L0, B19:L2]
% defined_1(a_0()) ....... U5
% defined_1(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0())) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U5:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U47:
% ~sum_3(additive_identity_0(),a_0(),additive_identity_0()) ....... B1
% ~defined_1(x0) | product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(x0),x0,multiplicative_identity_0()) | sum_3(additive_identity_0(),x0,additive_identity_0()) ....... B20
% ~defined_1(a_0()) | product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()), a_0(), multiplicative_identity_0()) ....... R1 [B1:L0, B20:L2]
% defined_1(a_0()) ....... U5
% product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()), a_0(), multiplicative_identity_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U5:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U1477:
% ~product_3(x1,x0,x2) | product_3(x0,x1,x2) ....... B7
% ~defined_1(x0) | product_3(multiplicative_identity_0(),x0,x0) ....... B9
% product_3(x0, multiplicative_identity_0(), x0) | ~defined_1(x0) ....... R1 [B7:L0, B9:L1]
% defined_1(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0())) ....... U46
% product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()), multiplicative_identity_0(), multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0())) ....... R2 [R1:L1, U46:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U1844:
% ~product_3(multiplicative_identity_0(),multiplicative_identity_0(),multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0())) ....... B2
% ~product_3(x3,x5,x2) | ~product_3(x4,x1,x5) | ~product_3(x3,x4,x0) | product_3(x0,x1,x2) ....... B21
% ~product_3(x0, x1, multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0())) | ~product_3(x2, multiplicative_identity_0(), x1) | ~product_3(x0, x2, multiplicative_identity_0()) ....... R1 [B2:L0, B21:L3]
% product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()),multiplicative_identity_0(),multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0())) ....... U1477
% ~product_3(x0, multiplicative_identity_0(), multiplicative_identity_0()) | ~product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()), x0, multiplicative_identity_0()) ....... R2 [R1:L0, U1477:L0]
% product_3(a_0(),multiplicative_identity_0(),multiplicative_identity_0()) ....... U7
% ~product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()), a_0(), multiplicative_identity_0()) ....... R3 [R2:L0, U7:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% ~product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()),a_0(),multiplicative_identity_0()) ....... U1844
% product_3(multiplicative_inverse_1(a_0()),a_0(),multiplicative_identity_0()) ....... U47
% [] ....... R1 [U1844:L0, U47:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 61314
% resolvents: 61194 factors: 120
% Number of unit clauses generated: 44447
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 72.49
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 7 [1] = 39 [2] = 1578 [3] = 221
% Total = 1845
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 44447 [2] = 16754 [3] = 113
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] defined_1 (+)1440 (-)0
% [1] less_or_equal_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] product_3 (+)205 (-)23
% [3] sum_3 (+)110 (-)67
% ------------------
% Total: (+)1755 (-)90
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 1845
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 5528
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 61324
% Number of unification failures: 120510
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 11890
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 4195
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 2809
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 9
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 36988
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 15922
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 8
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 4
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2247
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 11544
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.03
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.19
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 181834
% ConstructUnitClause() = 38826
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.04 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: inf
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 1 secs
% CPU time: 0.27 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------