TSTP Solution File: FLD031-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : FLD031-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:30:02 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  13 unt;   4 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   54 (   0 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(existence_of_inverse_multiplication,axiom,
    ( equalish(multiply(X1,multiplicative_inverse(X1)),multiplicative_identity)
    | equalish(X1,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IpP44ac1dA/E---3.1_26765.p',existence_of_inverse_multiplication) ).

cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IpP44ac1dA/E---3.1_26765.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(a_not_equal_to_additive_identity_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(a,additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IpP44ac1dA/E---3.1_26765.p',a_not_equal_to_additive_identity_3) ).

cnf(transitivity_of_equality,axiom,
    ( equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ equalish(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IpP44ac1dA/E---3.1_26765.p',transitivity_of_equality) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse,axiom,
    ( defined(multiplicative_inverse(X1))
    | equalish(X1,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IpP44ac1dA/E---3.1_26765.p',well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse) ).

cnf(compatibility_of_equality_and_multiplication,axiom,
    ( equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IpP44ac1dA/E---3.1_26765.p',compatibility_of_equality_and_multiplication) ).

cnf(existence_of_identity_multiplication,axiom,
    ( equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1),X1)
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IpP44ac1dA/E---3.1_26765.p',existence_of_identity_multiplication) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_equality,axiom,
    ( equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IpP44ac1dA/E---3.1_26765.p',symmetry_of_equality) ).

cnf(a_equals_multiplicative_identity_2,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(a,multiplicative_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IpP44ac1dA/E---3.1_26765.p',a_equals_multiplicative_identity_2) ).

cnf(multiplicative_inverses_not_equal,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(multiplicative_inverse(a),multiplicative_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IpP44ac1dA/E---3.1_26765.p',multiplicative_inverses_not_equal) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( equalish(multiply(X1,multiplicative_inverse(X1)),multiplicative_identity)
    | equalish(X1,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    existence_of_inverse_multiplication ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    a_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(a,additive_identity),
    a_not_equal_to_additive_identity_3 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ( equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ equalish(X3,X2) ),
    transitivity_of_equality ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    equalish(multiply(a,multiplicative_inverse(a)),multiplicative_identity),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( defined(multiplicative_inverse(X1))
    | equalish(X1,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    well_definedness_of_multiplicative_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    ( equalish(X1,multiplicative_identity)
    | ~ equalish(X1,multiply(a,multiplicative_inverse(a))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    ( equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3) ),
    compatibility_of_equality_and_multiplication ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    defined(multiplicative_inverse(a)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    ( equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1),X1)
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    existence_of_identity_multiplication ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    ( equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X2,X1) ),
    symmetry_of_equality ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    ( equalish(multiply(X1,multiplicative_inverse(a)),multiplicative_identity)
    | ~ equalish(X1,a) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(a,multiplicative_identity),
    a_equals_multiplicative_identity_2 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,multiply(multiplicative_identity,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    ( equalish(multiplicative_identity,multiply(X1,multiplicative_inverse(a)))
    | ~ equalish(X1,a) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    equalish(multiplicative_identity,a),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    equalish(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(a)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_18]),c_0_25])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(multiplicative_inverse(a),multiplicative_identity),
    multiplicative_inverses_not_equal ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_26]),c_0_27]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem    : FLD031-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 23:12:29 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.IpP44ac1dA/E---3.1_26765.p
% 0.17/0.46  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 26843 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46  # Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 675s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting U----_206e_02_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_208_C02CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # U----_206e_02_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 26851 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Result found by U----_206e_02_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.46  # Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.46  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 675s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Starting U----_206e_02_C07_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.46  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.46  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.46  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.46  # Parsed axioms                        : 31
% 0.17/0.46  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Initial clauses                      : 31
% 0.17/0.46  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 31
% 0.17/0.46  # Processed clauses                    : 155
% 0.17/0.46  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # ...subsumed                          : 11
% 0.17/0.46  # ...remaining for further processing  : 144
% 0.17/0.46  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Generated clauses                    : 333
% 0.17/0.46  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 252
% 0.17/0.46  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Paramodulations                      : 333
% 0.17/0.46  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Total rewrite steps                  : 114
% 0.17/0.46  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of processed clauses  : 113
% 0.17/0.46  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 49
% 0.17/0.46  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.46  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.17/0.46  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 61
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 159
% 0.17/0.46  # ...number of literals in the above   : 469
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Current number of archived clauses   : 31
% 0.17/0.46  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 450
% 0.17/0.46  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 410
% 0.17/0.46  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 11
% 0.17/0.46  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 167
% 0.17/0.46  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.46  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4832
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.46  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 0.17/0.46  
% 0.17/0.46  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.46  # User time                : 0.046 s
% 0.17/0.46  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Total time               : 0.056 s
% 0.17/0.46  # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.17/0.46  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.46  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------