TSTP Solution File: FLD030-4 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : FLD030-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:30:02 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 9 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR)
% Number of literals : 26 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity_multiplication_2,axiom,
( product(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ product(X4,X5,X1)
| ~ product(X5,X2,X6)
| ~ product(X4,X6,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lmHv1HqtSD/E---3.1_18942.p',associativity_multiplication_2) ).
cnf(product_5,negated_conjecture,
product(a,b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lmHv1HqtSD/E---3.1_18942.p',product_5) ).
cnf(existence_of_identity_multiplication,axiom,
( product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X1)
| ~ defined(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lmHv1HqtSD/E---3.1_18942.p',existence_of_identity_multiplication) ).
cnf(c_is_defined,hypothesis,
defined(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lmHv1HqtSD/E---3.1_18942.p',c_is_defined) ).
cnf(product_6,negated_conjecture,
product(multiplicative_identity,a,d),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lmHv1HqtSD/E---3.1_18942.p',product_6) ).
cnf(not_product_7,negated_conjecture,
~ product(d,b,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lmHv1HqtSD/E---3.1_18942.p',not_product_7) ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
( product(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ product(X4,X5,X1)
| ~ product(X5,X2,X6)
| ~ product(X4,X6,X3) ),
associativity_multiplication_2 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
product(a,b,c),
product_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( product(X1,b,X2)
| ~ product(X3,c,X2)
| ~ product(X3,a,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( product(multiplicative_identity,X1,X1)
| ~ defined(X1) ),
existence_of_identity_multiplication ).
cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
defined(c),
c_is_defined ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( product(X1,b,c)
| ~ product(multiplicative_identity,a,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
product(multiplicative_identity,a,d),
product_6 ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ product(d,b,c),
not_product_7 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09 % Problem : FLD030-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.02/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 23:28:52 EDT 2023
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.lmHv1HqtSD/E---3.1_18942.p
% 0.15/0.41 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # sh5l with pid 19025 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.41 # Search class: FGUNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # partial match(1): FGUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_006_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S2S with 118s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # G-E--_006_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S2S with pid 19032 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Result found by G-E--_006_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.41 # Search class: FGUNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # partial match(1): FGUNF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.41 # Starting G-E--_006_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S2S with 118s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.41 # Parsed axioms : 33
% 0.15/0.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 4
% 0.15/0.41 # Initial clauses : 29
% 0.15/0.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 29
% 0.15/0.41 # Processed clauses : 51
% 0.15/0.41 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.15/0.41 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 48
% 0.15/0.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Generated clauses : 96
% 0.15/0.41 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 84
% 0.15/0.41 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Paramodulations : 94
% 0.15/0.41 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Total rewrite steps : 28
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 48
% 0.15/0.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.15/0.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 32
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 62
% 0.15/0.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 231
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 106
% 0.15/0.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 97
% 0.15/0.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.15/0.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1786
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.41 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1788 pages
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.41 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.41 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.15/0.41 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.41 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------