TSTP Solution File: FLD030-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : FLD030-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:37:31 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.29s 2.05s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   8 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (  10   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   7   >;   4   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (;  10   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ less_or_equal > equalish > defined > multiply > add > #nlpp > multiplicative_inverse > additive_inverse > multiplicative_identity > d > b > additive_identity > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(less_or_equal,type,
    less_or_equal: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(additive_identity,type,
    additive_identity: $i ).

tff(multiplicative_identity,type,
    multiplicative_identity: $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(additive_inverse,type,
    additive_inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(defined,type,
    defined: $i > $o ).

tff(multiplicative_inverse,type,
    multiplicative_inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(add,type,
    add: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(d,type,
    d: $i ).

tff(equalish,type,
    equalish: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(f_237,axiom,
    defined(b),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_239,axiom,
    equalish(a,d),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_199,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( equalish(X,Y)
      | ~ equalish(Y,X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_223,axiom,
    ! [X,Z,Y] :
      ( equalish(multiply(X,Z),multiply(Y,Z))
      | ~ defined(Z)
      | ~ equalish(X,Y) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_241,axiom,
    ~ equalish(multiply(d,b),multiply(a,b)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_58,plain,
    defined(b),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_237]) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    equalish(a,d),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_239]) ).

tff(c_67,plain,
    ! [Y_53,X_54] :
      ( ~ equalish(Y_53,X_54)
      | equalish(X_54,Y_53) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_199]) ).

tff(c_73,plain,
    equalish(d,a),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_67]) ).

tff(c_582,plain,
    ! [X_94,Y_95,Z_96] :
      ( ~ equalish(X_94,Y_95)
      | ~ defined(Z_96)
      | equalish(multiply(X_94,Z_96),multiply(Y_95,Z_96)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_223]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    ~ equalish(multiply(d,b),multiply(a,b)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_241]) ).

tff(c_589,plain,
    ( ~ equalish(d,a)
    | ~ defined(b) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_582,c_64]) ).

tff(c_597,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_58,c_73,c_589]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : FLD030-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 19:54:11 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.29/2.05  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.29/2.06  
% 4.29/2.06  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.70/2.09  
% 4.70/2.09  Inference rules
% 4.70/2.09  ----------------------
% 4.70/2.09  #Ref     : 0
% 4.70/2.09  #Sup     : 140
% 4.70/2.09  #Fact    : 2
% 4.70/2.09  #Define  : 0
% 4.70/2.09  #Split   : 0
% 4.70/2.09  #Chain   : 0
% 4.70/2.09  #Close   : 0
% 4.70/2.09  
% 4.70/2.09  Ordering : KBO
% 4.70/2.09  
% 4.70/2.09  Simplification rules
% 4.70/2.09  ----------------------
% 4.70/2.09  #Subsume      : 9
% 4.70/2.09  #Demod        : 34
% 4.70/2.09  #Tautology    : 33
% 4.70/2.09  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 4.70/2.09  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.70/2.09  
% 4.70/2.09  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.70/2.09  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.70/2.09  
% 4.70/2.09  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.70/2.09  ----------------------
% 4.70/2.09  Preprocessing        : 0.53
% 4.70/2.09  Parsing              : 0.29
% 4.70/2.09  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 4.70/2.09  Main loop            : 0.51
% 4.70/2.09  Inferencing          : 0.21
% 4.70/2.09  Reduction            : 0.13
% 4.70/2.09  Demodulation         : 0.09
% 4.70/2.09  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 4.70/2.09  Subsumption          : 0.12
% 4.70/2.09  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.70/2.09  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.70/2.09  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.70/2.09  Total                : 1.09
% 4.70/2.09  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.70/2.09  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.70/2.09  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.70/2.09  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------