TSTP Solution File: FLD021-3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : FLD021-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:27:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 2.52s 2.69s
% Output : Refutation 2.52s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : FLD021-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jun 6 14:13:22 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Mon Jun 6 14:13:22 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 13725.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.12/0.35 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.12/0.35 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 48
% 0.19/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 53
% 0.19/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 90
% 0.19/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 12
% 0.19/0.43 distinct predicate count: 4
% 0.19/0.43 distinct function count: 4
% 0.19/0.43 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.43
% 0.19/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 -------- PROOF --------
% 2.52/2.69 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.52/2.69 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 3 [ 1 2 124 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 4 [ 2 2 108 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 5 [ 2 1 143 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 6 [ 3 1 105 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 7 [ 3 2 359 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 8 [ 6 2 216 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 9 [ 4 2 103 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 10 [ 4 1 231 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 11 [ 4 2 378 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 12 [ 4 2 115 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 13 [ 3 1 487 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 14 [ 5 2 27067 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 15 [ 3 1 500 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 16 [ 4 1 567 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 17 [ 14 2 296 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 18 [ 3 1 452 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 19 [ 5 2 15780 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 20 [ 5 2 122 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 21 [ 18 1 291 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 22 [ 3 1 299 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 23 [ 18 2 136 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 24 [ 5 2 404 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Model 25 [ 4 1 153 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 2.31 sec ----> 1992 [binary,1991.1,25.1] {-} $F.
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Length of proof is 4. Level of proof is 2.
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.52/2.69 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.52/2.69 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 1 [] {+} sum(A,B,C)| -sum(A,D,E)| -sum(D,F,B)| -sum(E,F,C).
% 2.52/2.69 3 [] {+} sum(additive_identity,A,A)| -defined(A).
% 2.52/2.69 5 [] {+} sum(A,B,C)| -sum(B,A,C).
% 2.52/2.69 25 [] {+} -sum(m,a,a).
% 2.52/2.69 27 [factor,1.3.4] {+} sum(A,B,B)| -sum(A,C,C)| -sum(C,D,B).
% 2.52/2.69 51 [] {+} defined(a).
% 2.52/2.69 53 [] {+} sum(additive_identity,m,additive_identity).
% 2.52/2.69 149 [hyper,51,3] {+} sum(additive_identity,a,a).
% 2.52/2.69 150 [hyper,53,5] {+} sum(m,additive_identity,additive_identity).
% 2.52/2.69 1991 [hyper,149,27,150] {-} sum(m,a,a).
% 2.52/2.69 1992 [binary,1991.1,25.1] {-} $F.
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.52/2.69 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 ============ end of search ============
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 true clauses given 7 (21.9%)
% 2.52/2.69 false clauses given 25
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.69 FALSE TRUE
% 2.52/2.69 4 1 30
% 2.52/2.69 5 2 83
% 2.52/2.69 6 16 254
% 2.52/2.69 7 1 209
% 2.52/2.69 8 26 368
% 2.52/2.69 9 0 18
% 2.52/2.69 10 72 205
% 2.52/2.69 11 0 12
% 2.52/2.69 12 0 244
% 2.52/2.69 14 0 354
% 2.52/2.69 15 0 12
% 2.52/2.69 tot: 118 1789 (93.8% true)
% 2.52/2.69
% 2.52/2.70
% 2.52/2.70 Model 25 [ 4 1 153 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.52/2.70
% 2.52/2.70 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.52/2.70
% 2.52/2.70 Process 13725 finished Mon Jun 6 14:13:24 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------