TSTP Solution File: FLD021-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : FLD021-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.TyOZuJdh8p true
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 30 22:39:13 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.73s 1.30s
% Output : Refutation 4.73s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : FLD021-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.TyOZuJdh8p true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 23:43:13 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.62 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.62 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.62 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.20/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.20/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.20/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.20/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 4.73/1.30 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 4.73/1.30 % BCE start: 31
% 4.73/1.30 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 4.73/1.30 % PE start: 31
% 4.73/1.30 logic: neq
% 4.73/1.30 % PE eliminated: 0
% 4.73/1.30 % done 954 iterations in 0.586s
% 4.73/1.30 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 4.73/1.30 % SZS output start Refutation
% 4.73/1.30 thf(defined_type, type, defined: $i > $o).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(additive_identity_type, type, additive_identity: $i).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(m_type, type, m: $i).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(equalish_type, type, equalish: $i > $i > $o).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(existence_of_identity_addition, axiom,
% 4.73/1.30 (( equalish @ ( add @ additive_identity @ X ) @ X ) | ( ~( defined @ X ) ))).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 4.73/1.30 (![X0 : $i]:
% 4.73/1.30 ( (equalish @ (add @ additive_identity @ X0) @ X0) | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [existence_of_identity_addition])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(compatibility_of_equality_and_addition, axiom,
% 4.73/1.30 (( equalish @ ( add @ X @ Z ) @ ( add @ Y @ Z ) ) | ( ~( defined @ Z ) ) |
% 4.73/1.30 ( ~( equalish @ X @ Y ) ))).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl23, plain,
% 4.73/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 4.73/1.30 ( (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ X1) @ (add @ X2 @ X1))
% 4.73/1.30 | ~ (defined @ X1)
% 4.73/1.30 | ~ (equalish @ X0 @ X2))),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [compatibility_of_equality_and_addition])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(transitivity_of_equality, axiom,
% 4.73/1.30 (( equalish @ X @ Z ) | ( ~( equalish @ X @ Y ) ) |
% 4.73/1.30 ( ~( equalish @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl22, plain,
% 4.73/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 4.73/1.30 ( (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 4.73/1.30 | ~ (equalish @ X0 @ X2)
% 4.73/1.30 | ~ (equalish @ X2 @ X1))),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity_of_equality])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl156, plain,
% 4.73/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 4.73/1.30 (~ (equalish @ X2 @ X1)
% 4.73/1.30 | ~ (defined @ X0)
% 4.73/1.30 | (equalish @ (add @ X2 @ X0) @ X3)
% 4.73/1.30 | ~ (equalish @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X3))),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl23, zip_derived_cl22])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl5031, plain,
% 4.73/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 4.73/1.30 (~ (defined @ X0)
% 4.73/1.30 | ~ (equalish @ X1 @ additive_identity)
% 4.73/1.30 | ~ (defined @ X0)
% 4.73/1.30 | (equalish @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X0))),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl156])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl5115, plain,
% 4.73/1.30 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 4.73/1.30 ( (equalish @ (add @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)
% 4.73/1.30 | ~ (equalish @ X1 @ additive_identity)
% 4.73/1.30 | ~ (defined @ X0))),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5031])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(add_not_equal_to_a_4, conjecture, (equalish @ ( add @ m @ a ) @ a)).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( equalish @ ( add @ m @ a ) @ a )),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [add_not_equal_to_a_4])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl30, plain, (~ (equalish @ (add @ m @ a) @ a)),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl5290, plain,
% 4.73/1.30 ((~ (defined @ a) | ~ (equalish @ m @ additive_identity))),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5115, zip_derived_cl30])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(a_is_defined, axiom, (defined @ a)).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl27, plain, ( (defined @ a)),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a_is_defined])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(m_equals_additive_identity_3, conjecture,
% 4.73/1.30 (~( equalish @ m @ additive_identity ))).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, (equalish @ m @ additive_identity),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [m_equals_additive_identity_3])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl29, plain, ( (equalish @ m @ additive_identity)),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 4.73/1.30 thf(zip_derived_cl5335, plain, ($false),
% 4.73/1.30 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 4.73/1.30 [zip_derived_cl5290, zip_derived_cl27, zip_derived_cl29])).
% 4.73/1.30
% 4.73/1.30 % SZS output end Refutation
% 4.73/1.30
% 4.73/1.30
% 4.73/1.30 % Terminating...
% 4.73/1.34 % Runner terminated.
% 4.73/1.35 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------