TSTP Solution File: FLD019-3 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : FLD019-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 05:06:37 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 12 ( 7 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 11 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f83,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f76,f36]) ).
fof(f36,plain,
sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f27,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] :
( sum(additive_inverse(X0),X0,additive_identity)
| ~ defined(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cJ3uTX464S/Vampire---4.8_28051',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).
fof(f27,axiom,
defined(a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cJ3uTX464S/Vampire---4.8_28051',a_is_defined) ).
fof(f76,plain,
~ sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f29,f28,f33,f2]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X4,X5] :
( sum(X4,X5,X2)
| ~ sum(X3,X5,X1)
| ~ sum(X0,X3,X4)
| ~ sum(X0,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cJ3uTX464S/Vampire---4.8_28051',associativity_addition_2) ).
fof(f33,plain,
sum(additive_identity,additive_identity,additive_identity),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f14,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0] :
( sum(additive_identity,X0,X0)
| ~ defined(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cJ3uTX464S/Vampire---4.8_28051',existence_of_identity_addition) ).
fof(f14,axiom,
defined(additive_identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cJ3uTX464S/Vampire---4.8_28051',well_definedness_of_additive_identity) ).
fof(f28,axiom,
sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a),additive_identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cJ3uTX464S/Vampire---4.8_28051',sum_2) ).
fof(f29,axiom,
~ sum(additive_identity,a,additive_identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cJ3uTX464S/Vampire---4.8_28051',not_sum_3) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10 % Problem : FLD019-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 19:47:38 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.32 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN problem
% 0.11/0.32 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.cJ3uTX464S/Vampire---4.8_28051
% 0.60/0.79 % (28165)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (28163)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (28167)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (28168)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (28166)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (28164)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (28169)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.79 % (28170)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.80 % (28169)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80 % (28166)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.80 % (28166)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-28161"
% 0.60/0.80 % (28168)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80 % (28165)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.80 % (28166)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.80 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for Vampire---4
% 0.60/0.80 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.80 % (28166)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.80 % (28166)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.80 % (28166)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 % (28166)Memory used [KB]: 992
% 0.60/0.80 % (28166)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.60/0.80 % (28166)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.60/0.80 % (28161)Success in time 0.474 s
% 0.60/0.80 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------