TSTP Solution File: FLD014-3 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : FLD014-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:26:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.24s 2.41s
% Output   : Refutation 2.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  16 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   22 (   0 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(associativity_addition_1,axiom,
    ( sum(X,Y,Z)
    | ~ sum(X,U,V)
    | ~ sum(U,W,Y)
    | ~ sum(V,W,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',associativity_addition_1) ).

cnf(existence_of_identity_addition,axiom,
    ( sum(additive_identity,X,X)
    | ~ defined(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

cnf(existence_of_inverse_addition,axiom,
    ( sum(additive_inverse(X),X,additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_additive_identity,axiom,
    defined(additive_identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',well_definedness_of_additive_identity) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_additive_inverse,axiom,
    ( defined(additive_inverse(X))
    | ~ defined(X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/FLD002-0.ax',well_definedness_of_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(b_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b_is_defined) ).

cnf(sum_3,negated_conjecture,
    sum(additive_identity,a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sum_3) ).

cnf(not_sum_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(a),additive_inverse(b)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_sum_4) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,additive_identity,additive_identity),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[existence_of_identity_addition,well_definedness_of_additive_identity]) ).

cnf(35,plain,
    defined(additive_inverse(b)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[well_definedness_of_additive_inverse,b_is_defined]) ).

cnf(39,plain,
    sum(additive_inverse(b),b,additive_identity),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[existence_of_inverse_addition,b_is_defined]) ).

cnf(40,plain,
    sum(additive_inverse(a),a,additive_identity),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[existence_of_inverse_addition,a_is_defined]) ).

cnf(144,plain,
    sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(b),additive_inverse(b)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[existence_of_identity_addition,35]) ).

cnf(7871,plain,
    sum(additive_inverse(a),b,additive_identity),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[associativity_addition_1,40,sum_3,30]) ).

cnf(11018,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[associativity_addition_1,7871,not_sum_4,39]),144]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : FLD014-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 18:54:25 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.46  * 
% 0.20/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  "."
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-06T18:54:25
% 0.20/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-06-06T18:54:25
% 0.20/0.48  
% 0.20/0.48  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (|sum| ?X ?Y ?Z) (NOT (|sum| ?X ?U ?V)) (NOT (|sum| ?U ?W ?Y)) (NOT (|sum| ?V ?W ?Z))).
% 0.20/0.48  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (|sum| ?X ?Y ?Z) (NOT (|sum| ?U ?V ?X)) (NOT (|sum| ?V ?Y ?W)) (NOT (|sum| ?U ?W ?Z))).
% 0.20/0.48  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (OR (|sum| ?X ?Y ?Z) (NOT (|sum| ?Y ?X ?Z))).
% 0.20/0.48  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z) (NOT (|product| ?X ?U ?V)) (NOT (|product| ?U ?W ?Y)) (NOT (|product| ?V ?W ?Z))).
% 0.20/0.48  ; Recognized possible associativity assertion (OR (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z) (NOT (|product| ?U ?V ?X)) (NOT (|product| ?V ?Y ?W)) (NOT (|product| ?U ?W ?Z))).
% 0.20/0.49  ; Recognized commutativity assertion (OR (|product| ?X ?Y ?Z) (NOT (|product| ?Y ?X ?Z))).
% 0.20/0.49  ; Declaring sum to be commutative.
% 2.24/2.41  ; Declaring product to be commutative.
% 2.24/2.41  
% 2.24/2.41  #||
% 2.24/2.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.24/2.41  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.24/2.41  ||#
% 2.24/2.41  
% 2.24/2.41  ; Summary of computation:
% 2.24/2.41  ;     25168 formulas have been input or derived (from 142 formulas).
% 2.24/2.41  ;     11018 (44%) were retained.  Of these,
% 2.24/2.41  ;           57 ( 1%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.24/2.41  ;        10961 (99%) are still being kept.
% 2.24/2.41  ; 
% 2.24/2.41  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.006   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.002   0%   Assert                       (30 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.614  32%   Process new row              (24,201 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.806  41%   Resolution                   (282 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.004   0%   Paramodulation               (141 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (5 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.006   0%   Condensing                   (2,487 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.084   4%   Forward subsumption          (2,487 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.023   1%   Backward subsumption         (1,381 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.015   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (9,076 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.127   7%   Forward simplification       (24,201 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.160   8%   Backward simplification      (11,018 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.002   0%   Ordering                     (1,706 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 2.24/2.41  ;     0.096   5%   Other
% 2.24/2.41  ;     1.945        Total
% 2.24/2.41  ;     1.947        Real time
% 2.24/2.42  ; 
% 2.24/2.42  ; Term-hash-array has 16,122 terms in all.
% 2.24/2.42  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,330 entries (1,330 at peak, 1,381 added, 51 deleted).
% 2.24/2.42  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,324 nodes (1,324 at peak, 1,360 added, 36 deleted).
% 2.24/2.42  ;  Retrieved 20,192 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2,487 calls.
% 2.24/2.42  ;  Retrieved 7,916 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,381 calls.
% 2.24/2.42  ; Path-index has 16,107 entries (16,107 at peak, 16,174 added, 67 deleted).
% 2.24/2.42  ; Path-index has 986 nodes (986 at peak, 995 added, 9 deleted).
% 2.24/2.42  ; Trie-index has 16,107 entries (16,107 at peak, 16,174 added, 67 deleted).
% 2.24/2.42  ; Trie-index has 45,866 nodes (45,866 at peak, 45,963 added, 97 deleted).
% 2.24/2.42  ; Retrieved 12,080 generalization terms in 26,757 calls.
% 2.24/2.42  ; Retrieved 9,735 instance terms in 9,636 calls.
% 2.24/2.42  ; Retrieved 1,734,626 unifiable terms in 20,778 calls.
% 2.24/2.42  ; 
% 2.24/2.42  ; The agenda of rows to process has 69 entries:
% 2.24/2.42  ;    17 with value 11             28 with value 12              24 with value 14
% 2.24/2.42  ; The agenda of rows to give has 10821 entries:
% 2.24/2.42  ;    39 with value (4 9)        1392 with value (4 15)         478 with value (4 20)
% 2.24/2.42  ;   231 with value (4 10)        133 with value (4 16)         720 with value (4 21)
% 2.24/2.42  ;   758 with value (4 11)        726 with value (4 17)          25 with value (4 22)
% 2.24/2.42  ;   996 with value (4 12)        185 with value (4 18)         170 with value (4 23)
% 2.24/2.42  ;  2503 with value (4 13)       2170 with value (4 19)           5 with value (4 25)
% 2.24/2.42  ;   290 with value (4 14)
% 2.24/2.42  Evaluation took:
% 2.24/2.42    1.948 seconds of real time
% 2.24/2.42    1.795158 seconds of user run time
% 2.24/2.42    0.153007 seconds of system run time
% 2.24/2.42    [Run times include 0.256 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.24/2.42    0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.24/2.42    0 page faults and
% 2.24/2.42    123,791,648 bytes consed.
% 2.24/2.42  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.24/2.42  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-06T18:54:27
% 2.24/2.42  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.24/2.42  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------