TSTP Solution File: FLD011-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : FLD011-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 18:14:03 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP22574/FLD/FLD011-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 170] [nf = 0] [nu = 111] [ut = 69]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 455051] [nf = 128] [nu = 270051] [ut = 24262]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 49018663] [nf = 322] [nu = 48804109] [ut = 28052]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 125 secs [nr = 49852483] [nf = 450] [nu = 49423015] [ut = 28052]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 122391669
% resolvents: 122391085 factors: 584
% Number of unit clauses generated: 121938139
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 99.63
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 6 [1] = 63 [2] = 24193 [3] = 3790
% Total = 28052
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 121938139 [2] = 452899 [3] = 631
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] defined_1 (+)9391 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)18362 (-)299
% [2] less_or_equal_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)27753 (-)299
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 28052
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 183552
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 122391669
% Number of unification failures: 5019740
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 5490238
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 121650
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 52826
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 2689
% Max entries in substitution set: 6
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 121585424
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 116980150
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 16
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 5
% Number of states in UCFA table: 143997
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 359762
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 144000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 1.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.40
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 44
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 127411409
% ConstructUnitClause() = 121613470
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 134.91 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 407972
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------