TSTP Solution File: FLD010-1 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : FLD010-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 02:05:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.38s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : FLD010-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.7.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 00:30:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.36  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___200_C45_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_CO_S5PRR_S0V
% 0.12/0.36  # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptRRHorn.
% 0.12/0.36  #
% 0.12/0.36  # Number of axioms: 28 Number of unprocessed: 28
% 0.12/0.36  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.36  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.36  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.37  # 28 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.37  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.37  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 4 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.37  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.37  # 24 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.37  # 4 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.37  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 8 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 4 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 8 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 4 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (defined(additive_identity))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (defined(multiplicative_identity))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (defined(additive_inverse(X1))|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_55, plain, (~equalish(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (equalish(X1,X1)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (~equalish(multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity),multiplicative_identity))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (defined(multiplicative_inverse(X1))|equalish(X1,additive_identity)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~equalish(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (less_or_equal(X2,X1)|less_or_equal(X1,X2)|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (equalish(add(additive_identity,X1),X1)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (equalish(multiply(multiplicative_identity,X1),X1)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (defined(add(X1,X2))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (defined(multiply(X1,X2))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (equalish(add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)),additive_identity)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~equalish(X3,X2)|~equalish(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (equalish(X1,X2)|~less_or_equal(X2,X1)|~less_or_equal(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (less_or_equal(X1,X2)|~equalish(X3,X1)|~less_or_equal(X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (less_or_equal(X1,X2)|~less_or_equal(X3,X2)|~less_or_equal(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (equalish(X1,additive_identity)|equalish(multiply(X1,multiplicative_inverse(X1)),multiplicative_identity)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiply(X1,X2))|~less_or_equal(additive_identity,X2)|~less_or_equal(additive_identity,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X2,X1))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X2,X1))|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2))|~defined(X2)|~equalish(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (equalish(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2))|~defined(X2)|~equalish(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (less_or_equal(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2))|~defined(X2)|~less_or_equal(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (equalish(add(X1,add(X2,X3)),add(add(X1,X2),X3))|~defined(X3)|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (equalish(multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3))|~defined(X3)|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (equalish(add(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,X2)),multiply(add(X1,X3),X2))|~defined(X3)|~defined(X2)|~defined(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # Found 9 steps
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (~equalish(multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity),multiplicative_identity)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_57, plain, (~equalish(multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity),multiplicative_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_44])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_88, plain, (~less_or_equal(multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity),multiplicative_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_45])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_87, plain, (~less_or_equal(multiplicative_identity,multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_87, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_483, plain, (~less_or_equal(additive_identity,multiplicative_identity)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_46])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_529, plain, (~defined(multiplicative_identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_42])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_530, plain, (~defined(additive_identity)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_39])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_484, plain, (~less_or_equal(multiplicative_inverse(multiplicative_identity),additive_identity)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_484, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_527, plain, (less_or_equal(multiplicative_identity,additive_identity)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_527, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.38  # Returning from population with 7 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.12/0.38  # We now have 7 tableaux to operate on
% 0.12/0.38  # Found closed tableau during pool population.
% 0.12/0.38  # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.38  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------