TSTP Solution File: FLD006-3 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : FLD006-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:05:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.48s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 5 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f38,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f37,f29]) ).
fof(f29,plain,
~ sum(additive_identity,sF0,additive_identity),
inference(definition_folding,[],[f27,f28]) ).
fof(f28,plain,
additive_inverse(additive_identity) = sF0,
introduced(function_definition,[]) ).
fof(f27,axiom,
~ sum(additive_identity,additive_inverse(additive_identity),additive_identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_sum_1) ).
fof(f37,plain,
sum(additive_identity,sF0,additive_identity),
inference(resolution,[],[f33,f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X3,X0,X5] :
( ~ sum(X0,X3,X5)
| sum(X3,X0,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_addition) ).
fof(f33,plain,
sum(sF0,additive_identity,additive_identity),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f32,f14]) ).
fof(f14,axiom,
defined(additive_identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',well_definedness_of_additive_identity) ).
fof(f32,plain,
( ~ defined(additive_identity)
| sum(sF0,additive_identity,additive_identity) ),
inference(superposition,[],[f4,f28]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] :
( sum(additive_inverse(X0),X0,additive_identity)
| ~ defined(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : FLD006-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.11/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 20:32:40 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.47 % (10261)lrs+10_1:1_kws=precedence:lwlo=on:tgt=ground:i=99966:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99966Mi)
% 0.18/0.48 % (10277)lrs+1_1:1_aac=none:add=large:anc=all_dependent:cond=fast:ep=RST:fsr=off:lma=on:nm=2:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:stl=30:uhcvi=on:urr=on:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.18/0.48 % (10261)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.48 % (10261)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.48 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.48 % (10261)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 % (10261)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.48 % (10261)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.48 % (10261)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 % (10261)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.18/0.48 % (10261)Time elapsed: 0.096 s
% 0.18/0.48 % (10261)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.18/0.48 % (10261)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 % (10261)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 % (10258)Success in time 0.147 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------