TSTP Solution File: FLD005-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : FLD005-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 17:29:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.58s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   49 (   0 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(existence_of_identity_addition,axiom,
    ( equalish(add(additive_identity,X1),X1)
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oEteiizWhe/E---3.1_26120.p',existence_of_identity_addition) ).

cnf(b_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oEteiizWhe/E---3.1_26120.p',b_is_defined) ).

cnf(existence_of_inverse_addition,axiom,
    ( equalish(add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)),additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oEteiizWhe/E---3.1_26120.p',existence_of_inverse_addition) ).

cnf(a_is_defined,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oEteiizWhe/E---3.1_26120.p',a_is_defined) ).

cnf(transitivity_of_equality,axiom,
    ( equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ equalish(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oEteiizWhe/E---3.1_26120.p',transitivity_of_equality) ).

cnf(compatibility_of_equality_and_addition,axiom,
    ( equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2))
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oEteiizWhe/E---3.1_26120.p',compatibility_of_equality_and_addition) ).

cnf(associativity_addition,axiom,
    ( equalish(add(X1,add(X2,X3)),add(add(X1,X2),X3))
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oEteiizWhe/E---3.1_26120.p',associativity_addition) ).

cnf(add_not_equal_to_b_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(a,X1),b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oEteiizWhe/E---3.1_26120.p',add_not_equal_to_b_3) ).

cnf(well_definedness_of_additive_inverse,axiom,
    ( defined(additive_inverse(X1))
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oEteiizWhe/E---3.1_26120.p',well_definedness_of_additive_inverse) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    ( equalish(add(additive_identity,X1),X1)
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    existence_of_identity_addition ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    defined(b),
    b_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    ( equalish(add(X1,additive_inverse(X1)),additive_identity)
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    existence_of_inverse_addition ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    defined(a),
    a_is_defined ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ( equalish(X1,X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3)
    | ~ equalish(X3,X2) ),
    transitivity_of_equality ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(additive_identity,b),b),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( equalish(add(X1,X2),add(X3,X2))
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ equalish(X1,X3) ),
    compatibility_of_equality_and_addition ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(a,additive_inverse(a)),additive_identity),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    ( equalish(X1,b)
    | ~ equalish(X1,add(additive_identity,b)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    ( equalish(add(add(a,additive_inverse(a)),X1),add(additive_identity,X1))
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    equalish(add(add(a,additive_inverse(a)),b),b),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    ( equalish(X1,b)
    | ~ equalish(X1,add(add(a,additive_inverse(a)),b)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    ( equalish(add(X1,add(X2,X3)),add(add(X1,X2),X3))
    | ~ defined(X1)
    | ~ defined(X2)
    | ~ defined(X3) ),
    associativity_addition ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equalish(add(a,X1),b),
    add_not_equal_to_b_3 ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    ~ defined(additive_inverse(a)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_10]),c_0_12])]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ( defined(additive_inverse(X1))
    | ~ defined(X1) ),
    well_definedness_of_additive_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : FLD005-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.06/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 23:17:40 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.oEteiizWhe/E---3.1_26120.p
% 0.20/0.58  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.20/0.58  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # sh5l with pid 26221 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.58  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.58  # Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.58  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 135s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with pid 26229 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN
% 0.20/0.58  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.58  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.20/0.58  # Search class: FGUNF-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.58  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.58  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S04BN with 135s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.58  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.58  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.58  
% 0.20/0.58  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.58  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.58  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.58  # Parsed axioms                        : 30
% 0.20/0.58  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Initial clauses                      : 30
% 0.20/0.58  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 30
% 0.20/0.58  # Processed clauses                    : 1193
% 0.20/0.58  # ...of these trivial                  : 20
% 0.20/0.58  # ...subsumed                          : 422
% 0.20/0.58  # ...remaining for further processing  : 751
% 0.20/0.58  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Backward-subsumed                    : 138
% 0.20/0.58  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Generated clauses                    : 3929
% 0.20/0.58  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3300
% 0.20/0.58  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 0.20/0.58  # Paramodulations                      : 3913
% 0.20/0.58  # Factorizations                       : 16
% 0.20/0.58  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1197
% 0.20/0.58  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.58  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.58  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.58  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.58  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.58  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.58  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.58  # Current number of processed clauses  : 583
% 0.20/0.58  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 160
% 0.20/0.58  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.58  #    Negative unit clauses             : 6
% 0.20/0.58  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 417
% 0.20/0.58  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2140
% 0.20/0.58  # ...number of literals in the above   : 5970
% 0.20/0.58  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Current number of archived clauses   : 168
% 0.20/0.58  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 31478
% 0.20/0.58  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25463
% 0.20/0.58  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 425
% 0.20/0.58  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1757
% 0.20/0.58  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 25
% 0.20/0.58  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.58  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 51824
% 0.20/0.58  
% 0.20/0.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.58  # User time                : 0.076 s
% 0.20/0.58  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.58  # Total time               : 0.079 s
% 0.20/0.58  # Maximum resident set size: 1616 pages
% 0.20/0.58  
% 0.20/0.58  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.58  # User time                : 0.078 s
% 0.20/0.58  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.58  # Total time               : 0.082 s
% 0.20/0.58  # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.20/0.58  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.58  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------