TSTP Solution File: DAT334_8 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : DAT334_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:39:10 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.80s 1.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 3 unt; 13 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 13 ~; 9 |; 11 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 3 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 4 >; 4 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 8 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn 8 !; 3 ?; 6 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
'$ki_world': $tType ).
tff(decl_22,type,
'$ki_local_world': '$ki_world' ).
tff(decl_23,type,
'$ki_accessible': ( '$ki_world' * '$ki_world' ) > $o ).
tff(decl_24,type,
cs: $i ).
tff(decl_25,type,
sue: $i ).
tff(decl_26,type,
mary: $i ).
tff(decl_27,type,
john: $i ).
tff(decl_28,type,
math: $i ).
tff(decl_29,type,
psych: $i ).
tff(decl_30,type,
teach: ( '$ki_world' * $i * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_31,type,
'$ki_exists_in_world_$i': ( '$ki_world' * $i ) > $o ).
tff(decl_33,type,
esk2_1: '$ki_world' > $i ).
tff(decl_34,type,
esk3_0: '$ki_world' ).
tff(verify,conjecture,
! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
( '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
=> ? [X2] :
( '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X2)
& teach(X1,X2,cs) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.87uh1u5rew/E---3.1_29372.p',verify) ).
tff(db,axiom,
! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
( '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
=> ( teach(X1,john,math)
& ? [X2] :
( '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X2)
& teach(X1,X2,cs) )
& teach(X1,mary,psych)
& teach(X1,sue,psych) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.87uh1u5rew/E---3.1_29372.p',db) ).
tff(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
( '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1)
=> ? [X2] :
( '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,X2)
& teach(X1,X2,cs) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[verify]) ).
tff(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X9] :
( '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk3_0)
& ( ~ '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(esk3_0,X9)
| ~ teach(esk3_0,X9,cs) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
tff(c_0_4,plain,
! [X6: '$ki_world'] :
( ( teach(X6,john,math)
| ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X6) )
& ( '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X6,esk2_1(X6))
| ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X6) )
& ( teach(X6,esk2_1(X6),cs)
| ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X6) )
& ( teach(X6,mary,psych)
| ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X6) )
& ( teach(X6,sue,psych)
| ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X6) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[db])])])])]) ).
tcf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X2] :
( ~ '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(esk3_0,X2)
| ~ teach(esk3_0,X2,cs) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
tcf(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
( '$ki_exists_in_world_$i'(X1,esk2_1(X1))
| ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
tcf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
'$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
tcf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ teach(esk3_0,esk2_1(esk3_0),cs),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).
tcf(c_0_9,plain,
! [X1: '$ki_world'] :
( teach(X1,esk2_1(X1),cs)
| ~ '$ki_accessible'('$ki_local_world',X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_7])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : DAT334_8 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.2.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri May 3 09:15:47 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.87uh1u5rew/E---3.1_29372.p
% 0.80/1.00 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.80/1.00 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.80/1.00 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 29492 completed with status 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.80/1.00 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.80/1.00 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.80/1.00 # Search class: FHHNS-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.80/1.00 # partial match(1): FHHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.80/1.00 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 29498 completed with status 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.80/1.00 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.80/1.00 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.80/1.00 # Search class: FHHNS-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.80/1.00 # partial match(1): FHHNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.80/1.00 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.80/1.00 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.80/1.00 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.80/1.00 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.80/1.00
% 0.80/1.00 # Proof found!
% 0.80/1.00 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.80/1.00 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.80/1.00 # Parsed axioms : 15
% 0.80/1.00 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Initial clauses : 20
% 0.80/1.00 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 11
% 0.80/1.00 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.80/1.00 # Processed clauses : 20
% 0.80/1.00 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # ...remaining for further processing : 20
% 0.80/1.00 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Generated clauses : 3
% 0.80/1.00 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.80/1.00 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.80/1.00 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # NegExts : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.80/1.00 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.80/1.00 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.00 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.00 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.00 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.00 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.00 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.80/1.00 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.80/1.00 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.80/1.00 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.80/1.00 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.80/1.00 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.80/1.00 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.80/1.00 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6
% 0.80/1.00 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.80/1.00 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.80/1.00 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.80/1.00 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.80/1.00 # Termbank termtop insertions : 599
% 0.80/1.00 # Search garbage collected termcells : 76
% 0.80/1.00
% 0.80/1.00 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.80/1.00 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.80/1.00 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.80/1.00 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.80/1.00 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 0.80/1.00
% 0.80/1.00 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.80/1.00 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.80/1.00 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.80/1.00 # Total time : 0.021 s
% 0.80/1.00 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.80/1.00 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.80/1.00 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------